Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hamilton, 478 So. 2d 123.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alex Sigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Sigue 134 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233; cert.
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233 ; cert.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
1978)(rev'd); (rev'd), (second degree); (rev'd); (aff'd); (rev'd); (La.
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
Comeaux , 1993-2729 p. 5, 699 So.2d at 20 , cert.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
[47] (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (aff'd)(commuted to life by Governor); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); rev'd Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 , 115 S.Ct.
State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
[15] Commenting on policies inherent in Louisiana's capital sentencing procedure, : "While the character of the defendant is usually irrelevant to the determination of guilt, it is one of the factors on which the determination of sentence is focused."
State v. Smith 793 So. 2d 1199 La. 2001
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
Unlike the argument in some cases in which the prosecutor implies that it is not fair that the Defendant was afforded due process rights which he did not afford to the victim, see, (unpublished appendix at pp. xv-xvi) (prosecutor's argument in the guilt phase that while *886 defendant has been afforded every right, the victim "...
State v. Rice 736 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Matthews 720 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
State v. Comeaux 699 So. 2d 16 La. 1997
State v. Ford 694 So. 2d 917 La. 1997
-29 (La.1985); -10 (La.1981); State v. Smith, 91-0749 (La.
State v. Eisbruckner 688 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
cert, denied at 478 U.S. 1022 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233 ; cert.
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
Bourque, 622 So.2d at 233 ; cert.
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Jackson 608 So. 2d 949 La. 1992
During the pretrial proceedings the prosecutor notified the defense, that he intended to introduce evidence at the penalty hearing of the following crimes allegedly committed by defendant: Unadjudicated Juvenile Conduct 1.
State v. Salone 605 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 1319 La. 1992
1884, 1892 , 114 L.Ed.2d 432 (1991); cert.
State v. Sullivan 596 So. 2d 177 La. 1992
State v. Cage 583 So. 2d 1125 La. 1991
State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
263 , 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983); cert.
State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
1986); , 127 n. 7 (La.1985), cert.
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
State v. Bay 529 So. 2d 845 La. 1988
State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
263 , 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983); (La.
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
126 n. 6 (La.1985); (La.App.
State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
State v. Ward, supra at 588
State v. Lowenfield 495 So. 2d 1245 La. 1986
State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
In a recent case, this court noted that "fundamental fairness dictates that an accused receive adequate prior notice that evidence of unrelated criminal activity may be offered by the prosecutor in an effort to punish him for the charged crime."