DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Pierre v. Maggio, 445 So. 2d 425.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Lippman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Lippman 38 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Williams v. Cooper 945 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Warren Fuselier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Fuselier 885 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Davis 834 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Pierre v. Maggio, 83-0806 (La.1/27/84), , and any other case which is contrary to the provisions of this Act.
  • State v. Daniel 811 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    and remarked that: State ex rel.
  • State v. Course 809 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    and remarked that: State ex rel.
  • State v. Albercht 809 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    and remarked that: State ex rel.
  • State v. Williams 800 So. 2d 790 La. 2001
    S.Ct.1/27/84), , and any other case which is contrary to the provisions of this Act.
  • Blair v. Stalder 798 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Boles 750 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Section 2 of the act further provides, "The provisions of Section 1 of this Act shall legislatively overrule the cases of State v. Jackson, 83-2360 (La.S.Ct.6/25/84), , Pierre v. Maggio, 83-0860 (La.S.Ct.1/27/84), , and any other case which is contrary to the provisions of this Act."
  • Lay v. La. Dept. of Correction 734 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Taylor 683 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Harris 665 So. 2d 1164 La. 1996
  • State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. State 580 So. 2d 906 La. 1991
    both per curiam opinions which held that the custodian's obligation is to see that only the sentence imposed is the sentence served, and ordered the Department of Corrections to correct their records to show the sentence to be served as imposed without restriction as to parole eligibility.
  • Jackson v. Phelps 506 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State ex rel. Milby v. State 471 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Coleman 451 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Court required the Department of Corrections to consider parole eligibility for a defendant who was illegally sentenced with that benefit contrary to a statute that prohibited parole eligibility.
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 682 La. 1984