Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite La. State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs, 486 So. 2d 116.

164 citing documents.

Surety Associates, LLC, As Trustee of The FairQ Trust v. Sharee Light La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
In Re: Derrick K. Williams La. 2023
Regarding respondent’s conversion of client funds by failing to pay Mr. Stewart or his third-party medical provider, in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs , (La.
In Re: Stavros Panagoulopoulos La. 2022
The trust account violations warrant an eighteen-month suspension under Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Kenneth J. Daigle, Individually and in his capacity as the Representative of the Succession of June P. LaFrance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
In Re: Jerome M. Volk, Jr. La. 2021
Considering the guidelines set forth in the seminal case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In Re: Kevin C. Schoenberger La. 2021
.” Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Catherine J. Estis, Samuel C. Estis and Thuy P. Estis v. Clifton L. Mills, Kimberly M. Mills, Twin … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Id.; See also; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, 13 (La.
In Re: Dounnisei Kuo Gbalazeh La. 2020
In determining the appropriate sanction in Weber , we cited the seminal case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Clerk of Court For the Court In Re: Nicholas Anthony Bellard La. 2020
After considering the ABA’s Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions and Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Clerk of Court For the Court In Re: John Edward Whalen, Jr. La. 2020
Considering these findings, as well as the court’s decision in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs , (La.
Derome A. Seals v. Robert L. Lucien and Quality MacHinery, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Alvin J. Chaisson v. Colby Garrett Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
In re Fontenot 255 So. 3d 1009 La. 2018
The committee also determined the baseline sanction is disbarment based upon the ABA's Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions , as well as the sanction guidelines for misconduct involving conversion of client funds set forth in Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs , (La.
In re Dunn 241 So. 3d 984 La. 2018
In determining an appropriate sanction, the board took guidance from Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs , (La.
In re Fos 237 So. 3d 510 La. 2018
See generally Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs , (La.
In Re: Harold D. Register La. 2018
Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Derouen 226 So. 3d 1096 La. 2017
In determining the appropriate sanction in Weber, we relied upon the seminal case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Martin 226 So. 3d 1108 La. 2017
As in other conversion cases, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Jones v. Americas Insurance Co. 226 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Wilson 221 So. 3d 40 La. 2017
In Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Moorman 217 So. 3d 316 La. 2017
In Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
Dileo v. Horn 189 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Re Walter C. DUMAS 187 So. 3d 428 La. 2016
The committee noted that under the guidelines set forth in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Weber 177 So. 3d 106 La. 2015
The applicable baseline sanction in this matter is disbarment, both pursuant to the ABA’s Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions and the seminal case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, which sets forth general guidelines for imposing discipline in a conversion case.
In Re: Phyllis A. Southall 165 So. 3d 894 La. 2015
Considering the seminal case of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, which sets forth general guidelines for imposing discipline in a conversion case, the board determined that an appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct falls within the eighteen-month to two-year range.
In Re Stacy L. MORRIS 149 So. 3d 229 La. 2014
While disbarment would ordinarily be appropriate under such circumstances, see Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In re Miller 139 So. 3d 993 La. 2014
Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, the committee considered the ABA’s Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions and the ease of Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, wherein the court set forth guidelines for sanctions in cases involving an attorney’s conversion of client funds.
Melerine v. O'Connor 135 So. 3d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In re Duplechain 131 So. 3d 843 La. 2014
In Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, we set forth guidelines for imposing discipline in a conversion case: In a typical case of disbarment for violation of DR 9-102 [now Rule 1.15], one or more of the following elements are usually present: the lawyer acts in bad faith and intends a result inconsistent with his client’s interest; the lawyer co
In re Stolzle 130 So. 3d 801 La. 2013
In determining an appropriate sanction, the board cited Louisiana State Bar Ass’n *805 v. Hinrichs, which sets forth general guidelines for evaluating disciplinary cases involving conversion and commingling of funds entrusted to a lawyer.
In re Fradella 116 So. 3d 649 La. 2013
In Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, we set forth guidelines for imposing discipline in a conversion case: In a typical case of disbarment for violation of DR 9-102 [now Rule 1.15], one or more of the following elements are usually present: the lawyer acts in bad faith and intends a result inconsistent with his client’s interest; the lawyer co
In re Cooper 90 So. 3d 1023 La. 2012
In determining an appropriate sanction, the committee looked to Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, (La.
In Re Spears 72 So. 3d 819 La. 2011
Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, the board noted that Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, departs from the ABA Standards for matters involving negligent con *823 version of client and/or third-party funds and, instead, establishes suspension as the baseline sanction: A suspension from practice of one year or less will typically result where the negligence in withdrawing or retaining client funds
Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
McFadden v. Import One, Inc. 56 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Re Dixon 55 So. 3d 758 La. 2011
In addressing the issue of an appropriate sanction
In Re Lester 31 So. 3d 333 La. 2010
Under this court’s holding in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, respondent’s misconduct would warrant disbarment, as he “[failed] to make full restitution or [did] so tardily after extended pressure of disciplinary or legal proceedings.” Disbarment is further supported by In re: Smith, 09-1141 (La.9/25/09), , wherein we disbarred an attorney who practiced l
In Re Geiger 27 So. 3d 280 La. 2010
In Re Judice 26 So. 3d 747 La. 2010
^Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, the committee cited Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinnchs, wherein this court held that a three-year suspension from the practice of law is appropriate in conversion cases in which the lawyer is guilty of at least a high degree of negligence in causing his client’s funds to be withdrawn or retained in violation of the disciplinary rule.
In Re Darien D. Lester. 26 So. 3d 735 La. 2010
In Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs, we determined that disbarment was appropriate for conversion cases in which one or more of the following elements are present: the lawyer acts in bad faith and intends a result inconsistent with his client’s interest; the lawyer commits forgery or other fraudulent acts in connection with the violation; the
In Re Cooper 23 So. 3d 886 La. 2009
See Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs
In Re Sharp 16 So. 3d 343 La. 2009
See In re: Bernstein, 07-1049 (La.10/16/07), ; In re: Kelly, 98-0368 (La.6/5/98), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs
In Re Ellzey 9 So. 3d 839 La. 2009
See Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Hinrichs
SOUTHERN CHIROPRACTIC AND SPORTS REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. v. Coleman 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Re Bernstein 966 So. 2d 537 La. 2007
See In re: Kelly, 98-0368 (La.6/5/98)
In Re Jones 952 So. 2d 673 La. 2007
In Re Pharr 950 So. 2d 636 La. 2007
In Re Shortess 950 So. 2d 570 La. 2007
we conducted an extensive review of the jurisprudence in conversion cases in order to determine the appropriate sanctions for different types of conversion.
Alvarez v. Clasen 946 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Aymond, supra; W. Prosser & W. Keeton, Torts, § 15 at 98-99 (5th ed.1984).