Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., 452 So. 2d 162.

27 citing documents.

Henry Ferger v. House of Blues New Orleans Restaurant Corporation D/B/A House of Blues New Orleans, Live Nation … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca–Cola Bottling Co., (La.
Pamela Parquet, as Curatrix for Derron Micah Parquet Versus Louisiana Homecare of Lutcher, L.L.C. and Eddie Hebert La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
App. 5 Cir. 4/15/15), Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., (La.
Ainsworth ex rel. Mother v. Am. Home Assurance Co. 239 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
(citing Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. , , 164 (La.
Balthazar v. Hensley R. Lee Contracting, Inc. 214 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Fiveash v. Pat O'Brien's Bar, Inc. 201 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Id., (emphasis in original).
Brown v. Evans Harvey Corp. 170 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.1988), writ denied, citing Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd.
J.R.A. Inc. v. Essex Insurance Co. 72 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Brooks v. State *877 Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Alice Mabel Crews v. Broussard Plumbing and Heating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., (La.
Crews v. BROUSSARD PLUMBING AND HEATING 38 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., , (La.1984), stated as follows: In a civil case, the plaintiffs burden is to prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Cotton v. DELTA QUEEN STEAMBOAT CO., INC. 36 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd.
Robertson v. Hessler 13 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Dumaine v. Gulf Group, Inc. 937 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “If circumstantial evidence is relied upon, that evidence, taken as a whole, must exclude every other reasonable 1 ^hypothesis with a fair amount of certainty.
Benjamin v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 893 So. 2d 1 La. 2004
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Brooks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 855 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: If circumstantial evidence is relied upon, that evidence, taken as a whole, must exclude every other reasonable hypothesis with a fair amount of certainty.
Wood v. Becnel 840 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
the Supreme Court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence as follows: In a civil case, the plaintiffs burden is to prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Stroik v. Ponseti 699 So. 2d 1072 La. 1997
George v. Pigno 696 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
at 745 , citing Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd.
Gagliano v. Amax Metals Recovery, Inc. 693 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
In Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., the Supreme Court explained the standard for relying solely on circumstantial evidence to prove one's case.
Whitley v. Manning 623 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd.
American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. General Motors Corp. 582 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Lacy v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd,.
Wisner v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR 537 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd.
Moore v. Clark 517 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd.
Florists' Mutual Insurance Co. v. Homecraft Corp. 506 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Company, Ltd.
Landry v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 497 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd.
Booty v. Kentwood Manor Nursing Home, Inc. 483 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd., (La.App.
Simms v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 469 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
This matter comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court, , with instructions to reconsider our original decision in the light of Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd.
Simms v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 456 So. 2d 163 La. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by