Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., 455 So. 2d 1364.

248 citing documents.

  • Romaguera v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., was a lawsuit over the death of one patron and the injury of another by a shotgun blast during an armed robbery of the restaurant.
  • Rowe v. Schumpert Medical Center 647 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 93-1848 (La.App.
  • Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 646 So. 2d 318 La. 1994
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • David v. Guidry 645 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Barrie, supra citing Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co. 641 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    As *562 was the case in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., we find it troublesome that because of the formulation of the jury interrogatories, we do not know how the jury resolved the elements of the duty/risk formulation.
  • Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Chelpanoff v. Placid Oil Co. 636 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Hodge v. Liquid Ventures 634 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Metz v. Howard 631 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    Given the above configuration of the accident site, and assuming that the jury believed Howard's testimony that the truck was in the grass, the question is then whether in leaving the vehicle in that position after dark Howard breached some duty imposed on him by law to protect against the risk involved, Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Rick v. STATE, DOTD 630 So. 2d 1271 La. 1994
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Corley v. Delaney 629 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Dye v. SCHWEGMANN BROS. SUPERMARKETS 627 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    for the same proposition.
  • Barrie v. VP Exterminators, Inc. 625 So. 2d 1007 La. 1993
    See Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 625 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Blair v. Tynes 621 So. 2d 591 La. 1993
  • Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. 620 So. 2d 811 La. 1993
    Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Thuan Ngoc Do v. Phuong Hoang Ngo 618 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    The leading case outlining the duty of a business proprietor to a customer is Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Louisiana Commercial Bank v. GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. 618 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Brock v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 617 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    DUTY-RISK ANALYSIS Applying the duty-risk analysis to similar suits, the Louisiana Supreme Court instructed in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., that the pertinent inquiries are: "I. Whether the conduct of which plaintiff complains was a cause-in-fact of the harm.
  • McCullom v. Regional Transit Authority 616 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Plaintiff also submits that the instant case is analogous to Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., where the court held that although a business owner generally owes no duty to protect patrons from assaults by third parties, if it assumes such a duty, it is liable for negligently performing or failing to perform that duty.
  • Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE 615 So. 2d 318 La. 1993
    (on reh'g); Harris v. Pizza Hut, Inc., (La.
  • Mundy v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 609 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    See, e.g.: Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  • Hebert v. Taco Bell Corp. 613 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • Haskins v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 612 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Hanewinckel v. ST. PAUL'S PROP. & LIABILITY INSURANCE, CO. 611 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Instead, it is simply a suit for negligence involving essential facts almost identical to those presented in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Dye v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 607 So. 2d 564 La. 1992
    The jury instruction was an incorrect statement of the law under Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Harrison v. Clark 607 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Scott v. Pack 607 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Grow v. Transocean Contractors, Inc. 610 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    1985); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., -90 (La.App.
  • Potter v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Scotlandville 602 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jarreau v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 600 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., -70 (La.
  • Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
    -53 (La.1990); -12 (La.1990); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Dye v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 599 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., , (La.
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 596 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Roux v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 597 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent. 598 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Ureta v. DOTD 594 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Wellons v. Grayson 583 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    company for the adjoining landowners (Sizeler), alleging that Sizeler failed to take reasonable action to protect Carriere from a threat of criminal harm; even though no special relationship existed between Sizeler and Carriere which would give rise to a duty, plaintiffs argued that Sizeler had undertaken a duty to protect Carriere against criminals, citing Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Thompson v. Hodge 577 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Russell v. McDonald's Corp. 576 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • Miller v. Everett 576 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    See generally Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214 (5 Cir.1984)."
  • Boue v. Loomis Armored, Inc. 575 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    In Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Jacobs v. Parsons, Inc. 572 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    We rejected the contention that Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., limits the duty to protect one’s business patrons so that the duty to protect can be breached only when a business has assumed such duty.
  • Barnes v. Bott 571 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n 567 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Henderson v. Louisiana Downs, Inc. 566 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 562 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3 Cir.1988), writ den., Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.