Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., 455 So. 2d 1364.
-
Romaguera v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
648 So. 2d 1000
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., was a lawsuit over the death of one patron and the injury of another by a shotgun blast during an armed robbery of the restaurant.
-
Rowe v. Schumpert Medical Center
647 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 93-1848 (La.App.
-
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.
646 So. 2d 318
La. 1994
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
David v. Guidry
645 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Barrie, supra citing Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co.
641 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
As *562 was the case in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., we find it troublesome that because of the formulation of the jury interrogatories, we do not know how the jury resolved the elements of the duty/risk formulation.
-
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
638 So. 2d 1168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
- Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Chelpanoff v. Placid Oil Co.
636 So. 2d 930
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Hodge v. Liquid Ventures
634 So. 2d 1337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
-
Metz v. Howard
631 So. 2d 1248
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Given the above configuration of the accident site, and assuming that the jury believed Howard's testimony that the truck was in the grass, the question is then whether in leaving the vehicle in that position after dark Howard breached some duty imposed on him by law to protect against the risk involved, Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Rick v. STATE, DOTD
630 So. 2d 1271
La. 1994
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Corley v. Delaney
629 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Dye v. SCHWEGMANN BROS. SUPERMARKETS
627 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
for the same proposition.
-
Barrie v. VP Exterminators, Inc.
625 So. 2d 1007
La. 1993
See Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR
625 So. 2d 600
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
- Blair v. Tynes 621 So. 2d 591 La. 1993
-
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res.
620 So. 2d 811
La. 1993
Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ; Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
-
Thuan Ngoc Do v. Phuong Hoang Ngo
618 So. 2d 1213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The leading case outlining the duty of a business proprietor to a customer is Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Louisiana Commercial Bank v. GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL LIFE INS. CO.
618 So. 2d 1091
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Brock v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
617 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
DUTY-RISK ANALYSIS Applying the duty-risk analysis to similar suits, the Louisiana Supreme Court instructed in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., that the pertinent inquiries are: "I. Whether the conduct of which plaintiff complains was a cause-in-fact of the harm.
-
McCullom v. Regional Transit Authority
616 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Plaintiff also submits that the instant case is analogous to Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., where the court held that although a business owner generally owes no duty to protect patrons from assaults by third parties, if it assumes such a duty, it is liable for negligently performing or failing to perform that duty.
-
Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE
615 So. 2d 318
La. 1993
(on reh'g); Harris v. Pizza Hut, Inc., (La.
-
Mundy v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES.
609 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See, e.g.: Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
- Hebert v. Taco Bell Corp. 613 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
Haskins v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
612 So. 2d 990
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
- Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Hanewinckel v. ST. PAUL'S PROP. & LIABILITY INSURANCE, CO.
611 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Instead, it is simply a suit for negligence involving essential facts almost identical to those presented in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Dye v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc.
607 So. 2d 564
La. 1992
The jury instruction was an incorrect statement of the law under Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Harrison v. Clark
607 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Scott v. Pack
607 So. 2d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Grow v. Transocean Contractors, Inc.
610 So. 2d 830
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1985); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., -90 (La.App.
-
Potter v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Scotlandville
602 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Jarreau v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
600 So. 2d 1389
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., -70 (La.
-
Roberts v. Benoit
605 So. 2d 1032
La. 1992
-53 (La.1990); -12 (La.1990); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Dye v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc.
599 So. 2d 412
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., , (La.
-
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University
596 So. 2d 1324
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Roux v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
597 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent.
598 So. 2d 1107
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Ureta v. DOTD
594 So. 2d 1111
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Wellons v. Grayson
583 So. 2d 1166
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
company for the adjoining landowners (Sizeler), alleging that Sizeler failed to take reasonable action to protect Carriere from a threat of criminal harm; even though no special relationship existed between Sizeler and Carriere which would give rise to a duty, plaintiffs argued that Sizeler had undertaken a duty to protect Carriere against criminals, citing Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Thompson v. Hodge
577 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
- Russell v. McDonald's Corp. 576 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
-
Miller v. Everett
576 So. 2d 1162
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
See generally Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214 (5 Cir.1984)."
-
Boue v. Loomis Armored, Inc.
575 So. 2d 527
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
In Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Jacobs v. Parsons, Inc.
572 So. 2d 360
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
We rejected the contention that Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., limits the duty to protect one’s business patrons so that the duty to protect can be breached only when a business has assumed such duty.
- Barnes v. Bott 571 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n
567 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Henderson v. Louisiana Downs, Inc.
566 So. 2d 1059
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp.
562 So. 2d 999
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3 Cir.1988), writ den., Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd.
561 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.