DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., 455 So. 2d 1364.

248 citing documents.

  • Frick v. Ensor 557 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Webb v. Smith 555 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Citing the Louisiana Supreme Court in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., the court stated that persons generally have no duty to protect others from the unanticipated or unforeseeable criminal acts of third persons.
  • Guidry v. Sam Grimmett, Inc. 557 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Forest v. State, Thru Louisiana Dept. of Transp., rehearing den.; Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Brady v. State, Through Louisiana Health and Human Res.
  • Fontenot v. Bolfa 549 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • LP v. Oubre 547 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    See generally Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214 (5 Cir.1984).
  • Willie v. American Cas. Co. 547 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    limits the duty to protect one's business patrons so that the duty to protect can be breached only when a business has assumed such duty.
  • Jones v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 544 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Plaintiff relies heavily on the decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Smith v. Walgreens Louisiana Co., Inc. 542 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., citing Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214, 227 (5th Cir.1984).
  • Vertudazo v. Allstate Insurance Co. 542 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., at 1370 (La.1984).
  • Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., at 1370 (La.1984).
  • Tabary v. D.H. Holmes Co. 542 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    *528 In Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., the Supreme Court of Louisiana discussed at length Louisiana’s duty-risk analysis in determining tort responsibility and also the pertinent law from other jurisdictions.
  • Kok v. Salazar 535 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    See Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Enterprise Transp. Co. v. Veals 532 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    The cases cited by plaintiff such as Rodriguez v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., are inapplicable to the present case since they deal with the duty of a business to provide a safe place for its customers.
  • Coblentz v. North Peters Parking, Inc. 533 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Prince v. Conoco, Inc. 529 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Sutter v. Audubon Park Commission 533 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    See, e.g.: Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.
  • George v. Western Auto Supply Co., Inc. 527 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Hayes v. Moss 527 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Martyniuk v. DL-Mud, Inc. 526 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Pratt v. Lifemark Corp. 531 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Cypress Oilfield Contr. v. McGoldrick Oil 525 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Foster v. COLONEL SANDERS KY. FRIED CHICKEN, INC. 526 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Stephens v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co. 525 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Scales v. St. John 522 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc., Treitler v. American Druggists’ Ins.
  • Francioni v. Rault 518 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Fields v. Gulf Oil Co. 517 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Toups v. Hawkins 518 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc.
  • Zellers v. National American Ins. Co. 514 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Bolden v. Winn Dixie 513 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in making the following findings: (Supreme Court, 1984) (2nd Cir.1985) the court concludes that the defendant Winn-Dixie is negligent under the facts and circumstances of this case.
  • Peacock's, Inc. v. Shreveport Alarm Co. 510 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    See Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Rhoto v. Ribando 504 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    In determining legal responsibility in tort claims, as stated in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., our courts have employed the duty risk analysis which requires pertinent inquiries quoted at page 1370 as follows: (1) Whether the conduct of which plaintiff complains was a cause-in-fact of the harm; *1122 (2) Whether there was a duty on the part of the defendant which was imposed to protect against the ri
  • Brownell v. Dietz Motor Lines 503 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Heard v. Bonnie and Clyde's of Hattiesburg, Inc. 501 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Melder v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 498 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., our Supreme Court stated: “Louisiana has for some time employed the duty-risk analysis to determine legal responsibility in tort claims.
  • Perret v. Webster 498 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Conner v. American Druggists Insurance Co. 495 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Relying on Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc., plaintiff urges that there was both a violation of the sheriff’s duty and substandard conduct.
  • Broussard v. Peltier 499 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Furthermore, in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., our Supreme Court recognized that: "Duty is a question of law.
  • Lee v. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. 493 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Eldridge v. Downtowner Hotel 492 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Corp., Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Jones v. Kwik Karol and Ginalco, Inc. 490 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Lalonde v. Mabry 489 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Ballew v. Southland Corp. 482 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp. 479 So. 2d 904 La. 1985
    1985); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., Smith v. Travelers Ins.
  • Spurlock v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket 475 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Martin v. Piggly Wiggly Corp. 469 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    The analysis in cases such as this was recently set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., (La.