Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University, 477 So. 2d 1094.

168 citing documents.

Armand v. State Department of Health & Human Resources 822 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
rev'd, in part on reh'g on other grounds, .
Garrison v. Blood Center for Southeast Louisiana 817 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Reed v. St. Charles General Hosp. 815 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Fleury 799 So. 2d 468 La. 2001
State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. State 779 So. 2d 735 La. 2001
of Sup'rs of Louisiana State Univ., -08 (La.
Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of *1229 Louisiana State University, (on rehearing).
Townley v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 762 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security, -1108 (La.1985) (on rehearing).
Frederick v. Ieyoub 762 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security, on rehearing.
Doe v. Southern Baptist Hospital 754 So. 2d 922 La. 2000
9:5628 pending a is reinstated.
Doe v. Southern Baptist Hospital 754 So. 2d 922 La. 2000
9:5628 pending a is reinstated.
Barrilleaux v. NPC, Inc. 730 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Broussard v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc. 732 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Armand v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN 729 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
This issue was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court for the first time in Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University (Sibley I)
Faul v. Trahan 718 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
*1088 See, Manuel, supra at 339 ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc. 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), ; (La.
Conerly v. State 714 So. 2d 709 La. 1998
In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Brown 715 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Charlet v. Legislature of State 713 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., recognized that in Article I, Section 3 of its constitution, Louisiana rejected the federal three-tiered system of equal protection analysis.
Ruiz v. Oniate 713 So. 2d 442 La. 1998
Revere v. Canulette 715 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State Univ., Agriculture and Mechanical College, (La.
Doe v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 717 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
of Sup'rs of Louisiana State U., in which the Supreme Court stated that when a law classifying individuals on the basis of physical condition is attacked, the proponent of the legislation must show that the law does not arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably discriminate against the disadvantaged class by demonstrating that the legisla
Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. Foster 711 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
See, Manuel [ v. State, 95-CA-2189 (La.7/2/96), ]; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96)
Phillip v. University Medical Center 714 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Guinn v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 708 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
1984), affirmed, on rehearing, on remand, (La.App.
Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree 707 So. 2d 12 La. 1998
See, Manuel, supra at 339 ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc. 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), ; (La.
TERRYTOWN FIFTH DIST. VOL. FIRE DEPT. v. Wilcox 707 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
and Pace v. State, Through Louisiana State Employees Retirement System, (La.
Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n v. State 705 So. 2d 149 La. 1998
of Sup'rs of Louisiana State U., provided an analysis regarding the multilevel system required to determine whether an individual's right to equal protection as guaranteed by Article I, Section 3 of the 1974 state constitution has been violated.
Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals 703 So. 2d 579 La. 1997
[2] (Sibley I), , vacated on reh'g, (Sibley II)
Backest v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation 702 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security, -08 (La.1985) (on rehearing).
Baudoin v. Acadia Parish Police Jury 702 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
1984), affirmed, on rehearing, on remand, (La.App.
Ruiz v. Oniate 697 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
See Sibley Vs. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U.
Lewis v. Roemer 696 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Sibley v. Board of Sup’rs of Louisiana State University
Conerly v. State 690 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
MED EXP. v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 684 So. 2d 359 La. 1996
of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, this court rejected the three-tiered federal system standard of equal protection review for interpreting and applying the equal protection clause of our state constitution found in Article I, § 3.
Whitnell v. Silverman 686 So. 2d 23 La. 1996
LAW AND DISCUSSION Because the court of appeal's opinion unequivocally states that this Court's opinion in Crier, supra, we are obliged to discuss the clear distinctions *27 between both cases for our readers and more pointedly, the appellate court's review.
Manuel v. State 677 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
and Mechanical College, [2] we construed this third sentence of Section 3 to mean that when a statute classifies persons on a basis therein enumerated, the statute is unconstitutional unless the proponents of the statute prove this legislative classification "substantially furthers an appropriate state purpose."
Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 669 So. 2d 1185 La. 1996
where this court held that by adopting the language in Art. I, Sec.
La. Associated Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMINI. 669 So. 2d 1185 La. 1996
where this court held that by adopting the language in Art. I, Sec.
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1135 La. 1996
Tomas v. Conco Food Distributors 666 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
City of Baton Rouge v. Williams 661 So. 2d 445 La. 1995
2d Cir.1990) () [w]hen a state law does not classify individuals by race, religion, birth, age, sex, culture, physical condition, or political ideas, but does so on any other basis, Art. 1 Sec.
Smith v. Dison 662 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-1108 , (La.1985), our Supreme Court provided a succinct analysis of Louisiana's equal protection clause: "Article I, Section 3 commands the courts to decline enforcement of a legislative classification of individuals in three different situations: (1) When the law classifies individuals by race or religious beli
Cook v. New Orleans Police Department 659 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
of Sup’rs of Louisiana State Univ., (La.
Whittington v. Wall 657 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security, -1108 (La.1985) (on rehearing).
Hensel v. State ex rel. Department of Labor, Office of Employment Security 656 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
With regards to equal protection, in Police Ass’n -63 (La.1995), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Turning to our state constitution, that Louisiana, in Article I, Section 3 of its constitution, rejected the federal three-tiered system of equal pro- *1081 tection analysis.
State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., reh'g denied, this court set forth the analysis required by the state's equal protection guarantee in the face of a legislative classification.
State v. Brown 648 So. 2d 872 La. 1995
2d Cir.1990) () [w]hen a state law does not classify individuals by race, religion, birth, age, sex, culture, physical condition, or political ideas, but does so on any other basis, Art. 1 § 3 of the Louisiana Constitution commands the court to decline the enforcement of the statute whenever a member of the disadvantaged c
INTER URBAN BAR ASS'N, INC. v. City of New Orleans 652 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Flagship Center, (La.App.
Roby v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS. OF NEW ORLEANS 650 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
examined the test for judicial scrutiny of a legislative classification on equal protection grounds: (1) When the law classifies individuals by race or religious beliefs, it shall be repudiated completely; (2) When the statute classifies persons on the basis of birth, age, sex, culture, physical condi
Police Ass'n of New Orleans v. New Orleans 649 So. 2d 951 La. 1995
Turning to our state constitution, (La.
Pace v. STATE THROUGH LA. STATE EMP. RET. SYSTEM 648 So. 2d 1302 La. 1995