DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University, 477 So. 2d 1094.

168 citing documents.

  • Griffin v. Kinberger 647 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    [ on remand, -14 (La.App.
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
    For a -09 (La.1985) (on rehearing).
  • Hutchinson v. Patel 637 So. 2d 415 La. 1994
    where this court reasoned the State Act did not apply to claims of negligence against a state hospital board because at that time the State Act defined "health care provider" in pertinent part as "[a]ny individual acting in a professional capacity in providing health care services, by or on behalf of the st
  • LOUISIANA INS. GUAR. ASS'N v. Gegenheimer 636 So. 2d 209 La. 1994
  • Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Gegenheimer 636 So. 2d 209 La. 1994
  • Harold v. La Belle Maison Apartments 636 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    of Sup’s of Louisiana State U.
  • Police Ass'n of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans 635 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Rankins v. STATE BD. OF ELEM. & SEC. EDUC. 637 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Rankins v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary & Secondary Education 637 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Chamberlain v. State Through DOTD 633 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Plaintiffs cite Sibley v. Board of Louisiana State University, *881 in support of their argument.
  • State v. Gamberella 633 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Const. art. I, § 3; (La.
  • Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co. 627 So. 2d 1366 La. 1993
    of Sup's of Louisiana State U.
  • Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
  • DeSalvo v. State 624 So. 2d 897 La. 1993
    -1108 (La.1985), this court held that Article I, § 3 commands courts to decline enforcement of a legislative classification of individuals in three different situations: (1) When the law classifies individuals by race or religious beliefs, it shall be repudiated completely; (2) When the statute classifies persons
  • Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD 624 So. 2d 874 La. 1993
    Lastly, DOTD cites, as did the court of appeal, ( Sibley I ), vacated on reh'g, ( Sibley II ), for the general proposition that limiting recoverable tort damages does not contravene LSA-Const.
  • Martino v. Sunrall 619 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    of Sup'rs of Louisiana State Univ.
  • Talley v. Succession of Stuckey 614 So. 2d 55 La. 1993
    of Supervisors, -08 (La.1985) (on rehearing); -24 (La.
  • White v. Frenkel 615 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    on remand, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that employers are answerable for damages occasioned by their employees in the exercise and functions in which they are employed.
  • Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD 621 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Salter v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    in part, reversed in part (other grounds) and remanded (La.
  • Salter v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    in part, reversed in part (other grounds) and remanded
  • Butler v. Flint Goodrich Hosp. of Dillard Univ. 607 So. 2d 517 La. 1992
    A rehearing was granted and those issues were given further scrutiny in Sibley II, which rejected the federal three-tier system of scrutiny.
  • State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
    State Univ., and state rights that have no explicit federal analog
  • Reed v. St. Charles General Hospital 602 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    The trial court erred by failing to rule on the issue of constitutionality and in failing to hold the requisite evidentiary hearing (requested by Mrs. Reed)
  • Gauthreaux v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 588 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • Milton v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 589 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Sibley v. Board of Sup’rs of Louisiana State University, (La.App.
  • Martin v. Rush's Fabricare Center, Inc. 590 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    of Sup’rs of Louisiana State U.
  • FLAGSHIP CENTER v. City of New Orleans 587 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    State v. Petrovich, 396 So.2d at 1322 .
  • Shields v. City of Shreveport 579 So. 2d 961 La. 1991
  • Hampton v. Greenfield 576 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    40:1299.39 was constitutional
  • Ewing v. Aubert 566 So. 2d 616 La. 1990
    It is of no moment that the Louisiana Supreme Court, held on rehearing that prohibiting malpractice judgments in excess of $500,000.00 classified individuals because of their physical condition *619 and may be unconstitutional.
  • Grider v. Adm'r, Dept. of Employment SEC. 564 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Maxwell v. Soileau 561 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Moore v. Roemer 560 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    -1108 (La.1985), the Court defined equal protection under the Louisiana constitution as follows: *938 Article I, Section 3 commands the courts to decline enforcement of a legislative classification of individuals in three different situations: (1) When the law classifies individuals by race or religious beliefs
  • Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 553 So. 2d 442 La. 1989
    (on rehearing), this court articulated three types of legislative classifications of individuals, and the standard of review and the burden of proof applicable to each under Article I, § 3 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • Pierre v. ADM'R, LA. OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. 553 So. 2d 442 La. 1989
    (on rehearing), this court articulated three types of legislative classifications of individuals, and the standard of review and the burden of proof applicable to each under Article I, § 3 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • Jarrell v. American Medical Intern., Inc. 552 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the traditional three-level system of scrutiny developed by the United States Supreme Court for the protection of individual rights under the 14th Amendment was an inappropriate model for equal protection analysis under LSA-Const.
  • Edwards v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 552 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    of Louisiana State U., on remand, (La.App.
  • Williams v. Kushner 549 So. 2d 294 La. 1989
    Since an equal protection challenge was raised, the trial court ordered a hearing to conform with the requirements of Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of LSU, All (on rehearing).
  • Winston v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 545 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Arceneaux v. Marler 542 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    of Sup’rs of Louisiana State U, somehow alters or modifies its previous position as announced in the aforenamed cases, is completely without merit.
  • LaMark v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 542 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    The standard of review of contested legislation under Article I, Section 3 (La.
  • Whitnell v. Menville 540 So. 2d 304 La. 1989
    trial court determines on remand that plaintiffs' claim is presribed, even as amended, and plaintiffs desire to pursue their argument that the statute is unconstitutional, they are entitled to present evidence in support of their equal protection challenge, in accordance with the evidentiary guidelines provided for such challenges by Crier ( (La.
  • Miller v. State Civil Service Commission 540 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    of Sup’rs of Louisiana State U., the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the scope of equal protection afforded by the Louisiana Constitution as follows: Article I, Section 3 commands the courts to decline enforcement of a legislative classification of individuals in three different situations: (1) When the law classifies individuals by race
  • Benedict v. Kearby 537 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    40:1299.-47 (B)(l)(a)(i), unreasonably discriminates against a person because of physical condition, in violation of Article 1, section 3 of the 1974
  • Guidry v. Federline 537 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    Appellants cite and rely on several cases, which mainly held that members of the LSU Board of Supervisors are not cloaked with R.S.
  • ACCOUNTANTS'ASS'N OF LOUISIANA v. State 533 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Neither does it violate the equal protection guarantee found in Article I, Section 3 of the Louisiana Constitution, although the analysis is somewhat different, (La.
  • Bridley v. ALTON OCHSNER MED. FOUNDATION HOSP. 532 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    3, [1] in that it unreasonably classifies individuals on the basis of an altered physical condition
  • Ewing v. Albert 532 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    It is of no moment that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Sibley v. Board of Su *885 pervisors of Louisiana State University, held on rehearing that prohibiting malpractice judgments in excess of $500,000.00 classified individuals because of their physical condition and may be unconstitutional.
  • Cooper v. Sams 532 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988