Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arrow Trucking Co. v. Continental Ins. Co., 465 So. 2d 691.
- Jerry Guye, III. and Guye's Construction v. Opelousas Housing Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- Perkins v. Carter 30 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Joseph v. Hospital Service District No. 2 of the Parish of St. Mary
923 So. 2d 27
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, “It is well settled that for a person to successfully maintain an action under a contract to which it is not a party the contract must clearly express the contracting parties’ intent to stipulate some advantage for the (third) person,” citing Fontenot , and making no
- Daigle v. Vanderpool 858 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 764 So. 2d 41 La. 2000
- Donaldson v. United Community Ins. Co. 741 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Clark v. Durbin 590 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
Distinguished
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS.
579 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In State Farm's first issue, in support of its argument that Jones, Walker can not proceed under the Direct Action Statute.
- Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co. 575 So. 2d 336 La. 1991
-
Spears v. McCormick & Co., Inc.
520 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the court said: "It is well settled that for a person to successfully maintain an action under a contract to which it is not a party the contract must clearly express the contracting parties' intent to stipulate some advantage for that (third) person."
-
Dartez v. Dixon
502 So. 2d 1063
La. 1987
to defeat plaintiff's claim of third party beneficiary status.
- Wilkerson v. Jimco, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
Emile M. Babst Co. v. Atlas Erection Co.
487 So. 2d 582
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Supreme Court held: It is well settled that for a person to successfully maintain an action under a contract to which it is not a party the contract must clearly express the contracting parties’ intent to stipulate some advantage for that (third) person.
- Myers v. Ford Motor Co. 486 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Wall v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport
482 So. 2d 865
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Co., citing Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co., 258 La.