DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 967.

999 citing documents.

  • Mulvihill v. Martin 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., : (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capacities of the actor, whether superior or inferior, and (5) any extenuating circumstances which
  • Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 9 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Sarhan v. Florists Mutual Insurance Company 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Womack v. CUSTOM HOMES AND RENOVATIONS 12 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., Arceneaux, supra at 1333 .
  • Nunnery v. City of Kenner 17 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co. In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sough
  • Bradley Chenvert v. Willis B. Ryland, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Our supreme court discussed the factors an appellate court must consider when reviewing a trial court’s : [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4)
  • Roland Brothers v. Direct General Insurance Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., should be used in determining whether the allocation of fault was manifestly erroneous.
  • CHENVERT v. Ryland 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Our supreme court discussed the factors an appellate court must consider when reviewing a : [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capacities of the actor, w
  • Brothers v. Direct General Insurance Co. of Louisiana 11 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., should be used in determining whether the allocation of fault was manifestly erroneous.
  • Tony Lavalais v. Melissa E. Brister La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., : [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the
  • Lavalais v. Brister 7 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., : [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (l)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capacities of the actor, wh
  • Jens v. Jones 8 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., wherein the supreme court identified various factors that may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was so
  • Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 5 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., wherein the supreme court identified various factors that may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Graffia v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 6 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., listed a number of factors for us to consider in determining the portion of fault attributable to the parties, including the level of the risk, whether the behavior was inadvertent or done with awareness of the danger, the significance of what was sought, the capacities of the parties, and any other ext
  • Forbes v. Cockerham 5 So. 3d 839 La. 2009
  • Prejean v. Rabalais 998 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Michael E. Prejean v. Christopher D. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Co., this court stated as follows: In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the conduct and the damages claim
  • Jones v. Parish of Plaquemines/Plaquemines Parish Government 1 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Harris v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 997 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., the supreme court articulated the factors appropriate for consideration in allocating fault between two or more parties: In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the cond
  • Abraham Fields v. National Automotive Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Edwards v. Pierre 994 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Crownover v. City of Shreveport 996 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., Bennett v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas.
  • Harris v. Delta Development Partnership 994 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., : In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the conduct and the damages claimed.
  • Jenkins v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 993 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., the supreme court articulated the factors appropriate for consideration in allocating fault between two or more parties: In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the cond
  • Jenkins v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 993 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Tassin v. Bendel 989 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • McNeill v. LANDSTAR RANGER, INC. 986 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., Morris v. Flores, 36,932 (La.App.2d Cir.3/7/03), ; McCullin v. U.S. Agencies Casualty Ins.
  • Porter v. MONROE HOUSING AUTHORITY 986 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    she can be no more than 10% at fault.
  • Moore v. Acadian Ambulance Air Med 983 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Linda Moore v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 983 So. 2d 798 La. 2008
    In considering whether the allocation of 10% fault to Exxon was manifestly erroneous, (La.
  • Eisenhardt v. Snook 986 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., Buchignani, supra .
  • MacK v. Wiley 991 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Bennett v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 983 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., Morris v. Flores, 36,932 (La.App.2d Cir.3/7/03), ; McCullin v. U.S. Agencies Casualty Ins.
  • Manuel v. Republic Vanguard Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    the supreme court explained *239 that, in assessing percentages of fault, a trier of fact must consider the nature of the conduct of the parties at fault as well as the causal relation between the conduct and the damages claimed.
  • Irene Manuel v. Republic Vanguard Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    the supreme court explained that, in assessing percentages of fault, a trier of fact must consider the nature of the conduct of the parties at fault as well as the causal relation between the conduct and the damages claimed.
  • Bishop v. Shaw 978 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • Thomas v. Sheridan 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Hager v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., the supreme court articulated the factors appropriate for consideration in allocating fault between two or more parties: In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the cond
  • Hager v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., the supreme court articulated the factors appropriate for consideration in allocating fault between two or more parties: In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the cond
  • Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 974 So. 2d 635 La. 2008
    ("[T]he trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relationship between the conduct and the damages claimed.").
  • Lawrence ex rel. Brown v. Groan 973 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 972 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Johnson v. Castleberry 968 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Ricks v. City of Shreveport 968 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Second, even if the grate was defective, Ms. Ricks was fully aware of its location and condition; (La.