DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 967.

999 citing documents.

  • Hutto v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. 79 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The assessment of fault is guided by the factors set forth in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
  • Elfers v. AIG National Insurance 80 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Harold Thibodeaux v. Melinda Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Daigle v. City of Shreveport 78 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Co., Buchignani v. Lafayette Insurance Co., supra.
  • Thibodeaux v. Trahan 74 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Smith v. City of Shreveport 73 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance, 2009-0669 (La.10/20/09), .
  • Starr v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 70 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • Jennifer Thibodeaux v. Bill Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    the supreme court identified factors to be considered when apportioning fault, explaining: [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2)
  • Thibodeaux v. Comeaux 69 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the supreme court identified factors to be considered when apportioning fault, explaining: *682 [Vjarious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (l)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the cond
  • Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • GARCIE v. Pasquier 70 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Co., Ricks v. City of Shreveport, 42,675 (La.App.2d Cir.10/24/07), .
  • Burdine v. Robertson 69 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance, 2009-0669 (La.10/20/09), .
  • Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
    The factors enunciated in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., are applicable to this determination.
  • Stratmann v. Cardiovascular Specialists, Inc. 65 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth various factors to consider in assigning degrees of fault, including: (1) [W]hether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduc
  • Matlock v. City of Shreveport 58 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Co., are factors to guide appellate court’s assessment of the highest and lowest reasonable percentages of fault which could have been allocated by the trier of fact: *1140 In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether th
  • August F. Tjon v. Dr. Steve Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • In Re Medical Review Panel Claim of Dunjee 57 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Muller v. Colony Insurance Co. 57 So. 3d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Moreover, with regard to the trial court’s apportionment of 50% fault to Janet, we cannot conclude that the trial court was manifestly erroneous in assessing 50% fault to Janet.
  • William Boyd v. the Wackenhut Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    11/09/07), guide our determination, but “the allocation of fault is not an exact science, nor is it the search for a precise ratio” and that, instead, we are determining whether the allocated fault falls within a certain range that does not violate the manifest error rule.
  • Smegal v. Gettys 48 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State ex rel. D.R. 50 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Schysm v. Boyd 47 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • Jeanine P. Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Co., the supreme court explained that, to determine the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relationship between the conduct and the damages: In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties
  • Pryor v. Iberia Parish School Board 42 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., the supreme court explained that, to determine the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relationship between the conduct and the damages: In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various f
  • Kathleen C. Pfefferle v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Co., : In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct
  • Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Tasha Tingle, Etc. v. American Home Assurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Tingle v. American Home Assurance Co. 40 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Pfefferle v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria 38 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., : In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (8) the significance of what was soug
  • Williams v. Moore 36 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • Townes v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 41 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder 40 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., : In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between the conduct and the damages claimed.
  • Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SEWERAGE COMMISSION v. Banks 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 35 So. 3d 230 La. 2010
    Drawing upon the factors set forth by this court in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., the court of appeal concluded that while both Jackson and Brewer were negligent, Jackson and his employer, Hunt, bear the greater degree of responsibility for the accident.
  • Savage v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 33 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • MILLIEN v. Jackson 30 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., Johnson v. State Farm Mut.
  • GOHRES v. Dryer 29 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Melba Lee See v. Entergy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., 974 (La.1985), issued the standard for allocating fault among multiple parties.
  • See v. Entergy Corp. 24 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., issued the standard for allocating fault among multiple parties.
  • Sara Labouliere Individually v. Sysco Food Services of New Orleans, LLC 24 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Crawford v. DIAMOND B. CONSTRUCTION, LLC 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Lee v. Briggs 23 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., listed a number of factors for us to consider in determining the portion of fault attributable to the parties, including the level of the risk, whether the behavior was inadvertent or done with awareness of the danger, the significance of what was sought, the capacities of the parties, and any other ex
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
  • Vick v. Pankey 15 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., : (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct; (4) whether the capacities of the actors were superior or inferior; (5) whether any extenuating circumstanc
  • Dennis Mulvihill v. Irwin Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., : (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capacities of the actor, whether superior or