Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Matthews, 464 So. 2d 298.

96 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deandre Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson 948 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Wade C. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Griffin 940 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Smith 935 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Michael Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Alexander 888 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Dillon James Merritt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Merritt 875 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State ex rel. D.P.B. 846 So. 2d 753 La. 2003
State Ex Rel. Dpb 846 So. 2d 753 La. 2003
State v. Chism 821 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Jackson v. Vir ginia, supra; State v. Hudson, supra; (La.App.
State ex rel. D.P.B. 817 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Gordon 809 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Clark 774 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Brumfield, 93-2404 (La.App.
State v. Hudson 760 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Jackson v. Virginia, supra ; (La.App.
State in Interest of La 666 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
1 Cir.1984), and (La.App.
State v. Pierre 653 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. In the Interest of T.N. 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. TN 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Mitchell 639 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Price 635 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Jackson v. Virginia, supra; (La.App.
State v. Thomas 620 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Court set forth the appropriate standard for a review of a claim of justification: When the accused asserts justification as a defense to murder, the state bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the killing was not justified.
State v. Wallace 612 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Mayho 601 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 600 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Moody 587 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Flowers 574 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Meshell 567 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Dietrich 567 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Clark 558 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Lilly 552 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Del Carpio 537 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Pravata 522 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Ardoin, 128 La.
State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Rosiere 488 So. 2d 965 La. 1986
State v. Garcia, supra ; State v. Ardoin, 128 La.
State v. Garcia 483 So. 2d 953 La. 1986
State v. Ardoin, 128 La.
State v. Quinn 479 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 477 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Matthews 468 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
By writ, No. 84-K-2083, , the Louisiana Supreme Court remanded this case to this Court for reconsideration setting forth that the applicable standard for our review is “whether a rational fact-finder, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the homicide was no