Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Simoneaux v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc., 483 So. 2d 908.
-
Jonathan Ley v. Geico Casualty Company
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (La.
-
Bernie Johnson Versus Consolidated Sewerage District 1 of the Parish of Jefferson, the State of Louisiana, Department of …
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (La.
-
Succession of Willie Hickman, Jr. .
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (La.
-
Jean Catherine Dragna Versus Terrytown Cafe, Inc. and Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., (La.
-
Jean Catherine Dragna Versus Terrytown Cafe, Inc. and Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., (La.
-
Pamela Parquet, as Curatrix for Derron Micah Parquet Versus Louisiana Homecare of Lutcher, L.L.C. and Eddie Hebert
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (La.
-
Gerald P. Snyder, Gavin P. Snyder and Tommy A. Guidry, Jr., All as Proper Representatives of the Decedent, …
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., (La.
-
Robert R. Winch v. Michael R. Totaro, Maureen J. Totaro, James Henderson Properties, LLC, Gwendolyn Doll, Gertrude Gardner, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
du Pont de Nemours & Co., (La.
-
Billy Jeal Mitchell, Jr. v. Randy Terry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
-
Mary Laforge and Wayne Laforge v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
du Pont de Nemours & Co., (La.
-
Robert Lagneaux v. Galloway Jefcoat, LLP
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
-
Deselle Milton-Gustain and Donell Gustain Versus The Salvage Store, Inc. and Covington Specialty Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., (1986).
-
Medical Review Panel Kevin Jordan (D) v. Community Care Hospital, J. Robert Barnes, M.D. and Anwar Ismail, M.D.
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
du Pont de Nemours & Co., (La.
-
Szewczyk v. Party Planners W., Inc.
274 So. 3d 57
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
du Pont de Nemours and Co. , , 912-13 (La.
-
Crump v. Lake Bruin Recreation and Water Conservation District
267 So. 3d 1229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
du Pont de Nemours & Co. , (La.
-
Edgefield v. Audubon Nature Inst., Inc.
267 So. 3d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
du Pont de Nemours and Co. , , 913 (La.1986) ).
-
Perniciaro v. McInnis
255 So. 3d 1223
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
du Pont de Nemours and Co. , , 912-13 (La.1986).
-
Harvey v. Krouse
244 So. 3d 533
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
du Pont de Nemours and Co. , , 912-13 (La.1986).
-
Bowen v. State ex rel. Sec'y of Health & Hosps.
247 So. 3d 948
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. , , 912 (La.
-
Whitney Bank v. Garden Gate New Orleans, L.L.C.
236 So. 3d 774
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
du Pont de Nemours & Co. , , 913 (La.
-
Ebarb v. Boswell
224 So. 3d 523
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
du Pont de Nemours & Co., (La.
-
Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. Brown
219 So. 3d 1265
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (La.
-
Dortch v. Jane Doe & Chrysler Group, LLC
217 So. 3d 449
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., -13 (La.
-
Dean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
217 So. 3d 611
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
du Pont de Nemours & Co., (La.
-
Rivarde v. City of New Orleans
190 So. 3d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
du Pont de Nemours and Co., ).
-
Baker Ready Mix, LLC v. Crown Roofing Services, Inc.
183 So. 3d 622
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., (“Under C.C.P.
-
Estate of Blankenship v. Louisiana Home Care Group, Inc.
166 So. 3d 461
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Finley v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 48,923 (La.App.2d Cir.4/9/14), .
-
Hayes v. Sheraton Operating Corp.
156 So. 3d 1193
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
duPont de Nemours and Co., ).
-
Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc.
154 So. 3d 643
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
du Pont de Nemours and Co.
-
Sibert v. National Oil Well Varco, L.P.
136 So. 3d 283
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Southern Indus.
-
Orleans Parish School Board v. Lexington Insurance Co.
118 So. 3d 1203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
du Pont de Nemours and Co., -13 (La.1986).
-
Percival Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
104 So. 3d 720
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
Flowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
99 So. 3d 696
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
James Bowlin v. Russell Taylor
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
McClanahan v. McClanahan
82 So. 3d 530
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., .
-
Rene' Owens v. Dr. Ruth L. Smothers, M.D.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., ), that “[t]here is no absolute right to delay action on a motion for summary judgment until discovery is completed.” Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 provides that a defense motion for summary judgment may be made at “any time” and that “[a]fter adequate discov
-
J. Clemille Simon, Et Ux. v. R. Scott Belaire
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
Simon v. BELAIRE
74 So. 3d 1250
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
Smith v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Shires
71 So. 3d 525
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.
-
Welch v. East Baton Rouge Parish Metropolitan Council
64 So. 3d 249
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., -913 (La.
-
Baker v. Knapp
42 So. 3d 1044
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., (trial court properly granted summary judgment within six months of filing of suit even though pending motion to compel and two unanswered discovery requests); (La.App.
-
Michael Glass v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc.
-
Jessica M. Parker v. University Medical Center
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., ), that “[t]here is no absolute right to delay action on a motion for summary judgment until discovery is completed.” Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 provides that a defense motion for summary judgment may be made at “any time” and that “[a]fter
-
Parker v. University Medical Center
30 So. 3d 1187
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
du Pont deNemours and Co., Inc., ), that "[t]here is no absolute right to delay action on a motion for summary judgment until discovery is completed."
-
Sarwat Gad, M.D., Et Ux. v. Robert Ray Granberry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., where the supreme court held that summary judgment is an appropriate method for disposing of a case in which intent is a critical question if conclusory statements of a plaintiff are insufficient to support a finding of intent by reasonable minds).
-
Gad v. Granberry
30 So. 3d 265
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., where the supreme court held that summary judgment is an appropriate method for disposing of a case in which intent is a critical question if conclusory statements of a plaintiff are insufficient to support a finding of intent by reasonable minds).
-
Mitchell v. VALTEAU
30 So. 3d 1108
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
du Pont de Nemours and Co., -13 (La.1986).
-
Cleotter Simien, Et Ux. v. Medical Protective Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., ), that “[t]here is no absolute right to delay action on a motion for summary judgment until discovery is completed.” Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 provides that a defense motion for summary judgment may be made at “any time” and that “[a]fter adequate discovery or after a case is set
-
Simien v. Medical Protective Co.
11 So. 3d 1206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc., ), that “[tjhere is no absolute right to delay action on a motion for summary judgment until discovery is completed.” Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 provides that a defense motion for summary judgment may be made at “any time” and that “[a]f-ter adequate discovery or after a case is set fo