Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Phillips v. Parker, 483 So. 2d 972.

39 citing documents.

William Brumfield v. Tom Darrick Berry And Charlette Annette Green La. 2025
However, in Phillips v. Parker , –76 (La.
James McCormick, D.D.S., and Kim Morris McCormick v. Joe E. "Butch" Ford, Jr., William "Bill" Altimus, Jerome Darby, … La. 2025
1026 Conti Holding, Llc v. 1025 Bienville, Llc La. 2023
Daniel J. Saloom v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“Any theory of constructive knowledge which imputes knowledge of the contents of the public records to third persons forms no part of the public records doctrine.”
Tss Properties, LLC v. Ray-Bayou, LLC and M & G Property Holdings, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel [v. Waller], 526 So.2d [1086, 1089-90 (La.1988)]
Joan Brunson v. Crown Brake, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel, 526 So.2d at 1089-1090
Brunson v. Crown Brake, LLC 275 So. 3d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel , 526 So.2d at 1089-1090 ; Phillips v. Parker , , 975 (La.1986).
Billie Thi Le v. Leeanna Vanderwater Lu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel, 526 So.2d at 1089-1090
Thi Le v. Lu 272 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1988) ] ; Phillips v. Parker , , 975 (La.1986).
Michaela Elouise Jordan Devos v. Robin L. Hooter, in Her Official Capacity as Rapides Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel, 526 So.2d at 1089-1090
Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Durham 261 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Phillips v. Parker , the supreme court was faced with a boundary action in which possessors under an act translative of title had obtained a parcel from a common ancestor of their neighbor, who demanded that they remove a fence that overlapped her property by thirteen feet.
International Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Charla Durham A/K/A Charla Holsomback La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
the supreme court was faced with a boundary action in which possessors under an act translative of title had obtained a parcel from a common ancestor of their neighbor, who demanded that they remove a fence that overlapped her property by thirteen feet.
Clovelly Oil Co., LLC v. Midstates Petroleum Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
[Peter S. Title, Louisiana Real Estate Transactions, § 8.16 (2009)]; Camel[v. Waller, - 1090 (La.1988)]
Clovelly Oil Co., LLC v. Midstates Petroleum Co., LLC 95 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
[Peter S. Title, Louisiana Real Estate Transactions, § 8.16 (2009) ]; Camel [v. Waller, -1090 (La.1988) ]
Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules 40 So. 3d 931 La. 2010
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel, 526 So.2d at 1089-1090
Louis D. Lallande, Jr. v. Larry Verrett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“The purpose of good faith acquisitive prescription is to secure the title of a person who purchases immovable property by a deed translative of title, under the reasonable and objective belief that he is acquiring a valid title to the property, and thereafter remains in peaceful possession of the property for more than ten years without any disturbance by the true owner.”
LALLANDE v. Verret 21 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The purpose of good faith acquisitive prescription is to secure the title of a person who purchases immovable property by a deed translative of title, under the reasonable and objective belief that he is *448 acquiring a valid title to the property, and thereafter remains in peaceful possession of the property for more than ten years without any disturbance by the true owner.”
Cockerham v. Cockerham 16 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Heirs of Morris v. Simpson, 43,693 (La.App.
Heirs of Morris v. Simpson 997 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In Re Succession of Hendrix 990 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
City of Shreveport v. Noel Estate, Inc., 41,148, p. 20 (La.App.
Mai v. Floyd 951 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE 939 So. 2d 1227 La. 2006
In so holding, which explained the public records doctrine as follows: The fundamental principle of the law of registry is that any sale, mortgage, privilege, contract or judgment affecting immovable property, which is required to be recorded, is utterly null and void as to third persons unless recorded.
City of Shreveport v. Noel Estate, Inc. 941 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Parish Nat. Bank v. Wilks 923 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the supreme court stated: The fundamental principle of the law of registry is that any sale, mortgage, privilege, contract or judgment affecting immovable property, which is required to be recorded, is utterly null and void as to third persons unless recorded.
Mathews v. Mathews 817 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Wagner v. FAIRWAY VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. INC. 813 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Scobee v. Brame 721 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Cantrelle v. Gaude 700 So. 2d 523 La. 1997
Gullatt v. Newell Industries, Inc. 688 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(Lemmon, J.) Also, as Judge Redmann has so aptly pointed out, it is an essentially negative doctrine.
Britt Builders, Inc. v. Brister 618 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In his ruling the trial court determined that Britt was a and that Civil Code Article 496 governed the outcome concerning the slab.
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Billingsley v. Bach Energy Corp. 588 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
AMERICAN LEGION CHAPPEPEELA POST 255 v. Morel 577 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Pelican Homestead & Sav. Ass'n v. SEC. First Nat. Bank 532 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
(Lemmon, J.) Also, as Judge Redmann has so aptly pointed out, it is an essentially negative doctrine.
Sonnier v. B & J Quality Interiors, Inc. 518 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Martin Fuel Dist., Inc. v. Trans Gulf Fuel, Inc. 496 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[4] the Louisiana Supreme Court expounded on the Louisiana public records doctrine and determined that the "primary concern of the public records doctrine is the protection of third persons against unrecorded interests."
Phillips v. Donaldson 494 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Dallas v. Farrington 490 So. 2d 265 La. 1986