Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN., 486 So. 2d 95.

26 citing documents.

H&o Investments, Llc v. Parish Of Jefferson, Through Its Parish President, Cynthia Lee Sheng And Opterra Solutions, Inc. … La. 2025
3d 1166, 1169; Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Administration , (La.
Pineville City Court, Et Al. v. City Of Pineville, Et Al. La. 2023
3d 1166, 1169; Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Administration, (La.
Jeff Mercer, Llc v. State Of Louisiana Through The Department Of Transportation And Development, Willis Jenkins, John Eason, … La. 2021
See Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin., (La.
Hamp's Construction, LLC v. 1031 Canal, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
See Alexander and Alexander, Inc., Div. of Adm., (La.
Sutton v. Adams 267 So. 3d 1112 La. 2019
Alexander and Alexander Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin., (La.
State v. McDowell 166 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div’n of Admin.
St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Hubert Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin.
St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine 118 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin.
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin., (La.
Ourso v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 998 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
P. art. 934; Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, Div. Of Admin., (La.
Wooley v. Lucksinger 961 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, through the Div. of Admin., appears the following: Under the provisions of La.Code of Civ.
Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In Alexander & Alexander, fn.
Goulas v. DENBURY MANAGEMENT, INC. 774 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Distinguished McElwee v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 729 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.1985), reversed on other grounds, we distinguished what type of hearings unsuccessful bidders and disqualified bidders were entitled to under the statutes.
Hays v. Volentine 694 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 934; Alexander & (La.
PROPERTY ASSET v. Pirogue Cove Apartments 693 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Southland Truck Center, Inc. v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co. 651 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
In Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State, Through the Div. of Admin., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Under the provisions of La.Code of Civ.
Mavromatis v. Lou-Mar, Inc. 632 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Alexander and Alexander, *833 Inc. v. State, Division of Administration
Reed v. City of Ville Platte 619 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Enerland Recovery Services, Inc. v. Parish of Lafourche 619 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration
Stafford Const. Co., Inc. v. Terrebonne Parish School Bd. 612 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration, the court noted that there are few cases in our jurisprudence which address the rights of an unsuccessful bidder on a public contract to recover damages.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. State 596 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1985), rev'd on other grounds
Persilver v. Louisiana Department of Transportation 592 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, through the Division of Administration, *1352 appears the following: Under the provisions of La.Code of Civ.Proc.
Trans Global Alloy Ltd. v. First Nat. Bank 564 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Alexander & Alexander v. State, Div. of Admin.
Davis v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 525 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court has recently considered whether a plaintiff who claims to have actually been the low bidder has a cause of action against the bidder who gets the bid under Article 2324 in Alexander & Alexander v. State, Division of Administration
Tucker v. Kelly 506 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Alexander and Alexander, Inc. v. State, through the Division of Administration, appears the following: Under the provisions of La.Code of Civ.Proc.