Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi, 485 So. 2d 915.

39 citing documents.

Daniel J. Saloom, Et Al. v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Transportation And Development La. 2022
See Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi , (La.
Nohc, Inc. v. Erroll G. Williams, Assessor, Parish of Orleans; Norman White, Director of Finance for the City … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Dln Holdings, L.L.C. v. Keith Guglielmo, Land Records Supervisor for Parish of Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Fraud may also result from silence or inaction.”31 ICC contends that Mr. Francis’s interposition of DLN and later Pelham Hospitality, LLC, in an attempt to avoid his personal liability, was fraudulent.32 DLN and Mr. Francis counter that the 29 Howard Trucking Co., (La.
Demecia King v. Town of Clarks and Mayor Chad Coates and Board of Alderman, Chrissy Jolly, Shawn Guinn, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
App. 5 Cir. 1985); affirmed cert.
Kano Investments, LLC v. Kojis Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co.
Kano Investments, LLC v. Kojis Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co.
Kano Investments, L.L.C. v. Kojis Construction, L.L.C. 113 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estop-pel is a “doctrine of last resort.” How *1119 ard Trucking Co.
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Insurance Co. 110 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co.
Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC v. Penn-America Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
We must narrowly construe this argument, as ―estoppel is not favored in our law,‖ Id., and estoppel is a ―doctrine of last resort.‖ Howard Trucking Co.
Brassette v. Exnicios 92 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co.
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1173 La. 2011
We must narrowly construe this argument, as “estoppel is not favored in our law,” Id., and estoppel is a “doctrine of last resort.” Howard Trucking Co.
Phoenix Associates v. EH Mitchell & Co. 970 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
John Blalock v. Kenneth W. Lord La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Blalock v. Lord 927 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Arabie Bros. Trucking Co. v. Gautreaux 880 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Blanchard v. ABC Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Krepps v. Hindelang 713 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir.1985); affirmed cert.
Cross v. Cutter Biological, Div. of Miles Inc. 676 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Howard Trucking Company, cert.
JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT HEALTH INSURANCE TRUST FUND EX. REL. MOULEDOUX v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 673 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Morris v. Friedman 663 So. 2d 19 La. 1995
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Case v. Louisiana Medical Mut. Ins. Co. 624 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
As recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Howard Trucking Co., (La.
Mellon Financial Services Corp. 7 v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 616 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Howard *1276 Trucking Co., Inc., v. Stassi, Fontenot v. Hanover Ins.
Succession of Hirt 612 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cadle Co. v. Dumesnil 610 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
5th Cir.1985), aff'd, cert.
CITIES SERVICE OIL AND GAS v. State 574 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
In Howard Trucking Company, (La.
State v. Smith 571 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Dye v. Ipik Door Co., Inc. 570 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Hannie 568 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
As the Supreme Court stated in Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. Gassenberger 565 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu Parish 561 So. 2d 482 La. 1990
As regards the use of equitable estoppel, and its viability under Louisiana law, : "Estoppel" in its various forms seems to be a doctrine of last resort.
Easy TV & Appliance Rental of La., Inc. v. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF REVENUE AND TAXATION 556 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
4th Cir.1971); Howard Trucking Company
Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 554 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Chauvin v. Jefferson Parish School Board 534 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1985), aff’d, cert.
Locker v. Wilson 536 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Lilly v. Angelo 523 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Dizell v. Durr 519 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Howard Trucking Co., cert.
Sonnier v. B & J Quality Interiors, Inc. 518 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir. 1985), aff’d, cert.
St. Amant v. Callais & Sons, Inc. 508 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1985), aff’d, cert.
University Prop. Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank 500 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[3] In Howard Trucking Company, the creditor transferred possession of vehicles and oil field trucking equipment to the debtor in a written agreement styled a lease.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by