Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., 475 So. 2d 1063.

31 citing documents.

Susan C. Scheinuk v. Lauren Levenson, State Farm Insurance Company, Daniel Williams and Jibri Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 9/14/12), citing MTU of N. Am., Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Lisa Leflore v. Valero Refining-Mereaux, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
MTU of North American, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (La.
Southern Aggregates, LLC v. Arnold Baker & Baker Ready Mix, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
“[T]here is a distinction between the sanctions available for a failure to comply with party-initiated discovery and for a failure to comply with a court order 7 to provide or permit discovery.” MTU v. N. Am., Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (La.
Alcorn v. Duncan 175 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Horton v. McCary, 93-2315 (La.4/11/94), ; MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
BancorpSouth Bank v. Kleinpeter Trace, L.L.C. 155 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (“[i]f the court grants an order compelling discovery under [article] 1469, and that order is subsequently disobeyed, [article] 1471 authorizes the court to impose such sanctions as are just”); Walley, 104 So.3d at 103 (absent an order compelling production of plaintiffs’ automobile liability policy, t
Monte McWilliams v. Exxon Mobil Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
McWilliams v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 111 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Franklin v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car 110 So. 3d 557 La. 2013
MTU of N. Am., Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Walley v. Vargas 104 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 1469(A)(4); MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Industrial Pipe, Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish Council 100 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
If that answer is in the affirmative, then the court determines whether an answer to the discovery would “expedite the litigation by either narrowing the area of controversy or avoiding unnecessary testimony or providing a lead to evidence.” MTU of N. Am., Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Quality Exterior Services, L.L.C. 92 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Leah Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, L.L.C. 82 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Office Furniture Outlet, Inc. v. Grau 12 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See, e.g., MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Robert Duncan v. Moreno Energy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
v. Raven Marine, Inc., et.al.
Duncan v. Moreno Energy, Inc. 1 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
v. Raven Marine, Inc., et.al.
Barber v. Ichaso 811 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Garza v. International Maintenance Corp. 702 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Helm v. Mervyn's Dept. Store 699 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Horton v. McCary, 93-2315 (La.4/11/94), , 203 citing MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (La.
LeBlanc v. GMAC Financial Services 695 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
MTU of North America, (La.
Carter v. Texas Industries 693 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
MTU of North America, LeJeune v. Lafayette Tower Service, 94-1240 (La.App.
Wollerson v. Wollerson 687 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
See MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., LaForge v. LaForge, 26,317 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/5/95), .
Rice v. Sagrera 657 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
LeJeune v. Lafayette Tower Service 653 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
NAT. UNION FIRE INS. CO. v. Cagle 649 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
[9] See MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (La.
Horton v. McCary 635 So. 2d 199 La. 1994
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
Lehmann v. American Southern Home Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Menzie Tile Co., Inc. v. Professional Centre 594 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., the trial court awarded travel expenses on a motion to compel.
Wilson v. Wilson 525 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The party seeking relief, however, has the burden of establishing good cause, not by mere conclusory statements, but by a particular and specific demonstration of fact.” MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc.
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 499 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc., (La.