Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fraser, 484 So. 2d 122.

341 citing documents.

State v. Samuels 657 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
In the Interest of Nunez 657 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 882 allows for an illegal sentence to be corrected at any time by the court that imposed the sentence, or by an appellate court on review, held that an appellate court could not correct an illegally lenient sentence where there was no complaint of the error.
State v. Hall 652 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Jordan 650 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Ford 650 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Boyd 649 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Brown 647 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Ruiz 647 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Spears 647 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Hamilton 648 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Burton 649 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Moore 642 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Allen 638 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that an appellate court may not amend or set aside an illegally lenient sentence on its own motion, when defendant alone has appealed and the prosecutor has not sought review of the sentence.
State v. Campbell 640 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Guillory 640 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Howard 635 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Frank 635 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
See, State v. Orgeron, 512 So.2d at 471 .
State v. Abbott 634 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
This court has reviewed this issue before but because the issue was not raised by the State or the defense, (La.
State v. Bush 634 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Whitley 634 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Brooks 633 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Harrison 631 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Williams 632 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Lewis 628 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Gaines 633 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Hills 626 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Arbuthnot 625 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Hupp 626 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Ross 625 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Washington 621 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Washington 621 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Daniels 619 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. McLaren 619 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Seal 615 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Bell 615 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Clark 612 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
However, this court cannot correct any errors patent favorable to the defendant.
State v. Dixon 610 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Riche 608 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Phillips 606 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Thomas 604 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Lucas 598 So. 2d 338 La. 1992
The defendant did not seek review of that order, reaffirming Jackson , and on remand the same trial judge then resentenced the defendant according to his original sentencing intent.
State v. Combs 600 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Johnson 598 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Flowers 598 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Yarbrough 596 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Lagarde 595 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Dorsey 593 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992