Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fraser, 484 So. 2d 122.

341 citing documents.

State v. Washington 591 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Moreno 592 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Conway 588 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Harrison 588 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Mitchell 586 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
However, that if the State does not complain about an illegally lenient sentence, then the appellate court may not amend or set aside the sentence, as error patent.
State v. Pittman 585 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Baudoin 583 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lindsey 583 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Jackson 582 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Washington 578 So. 2d 1150 La. 1991
State v. Bonier 583 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Washington 578 So. 2d 1150 La. 1991
State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Smith 578 So. 2d 1150 La. 1991
State v. Desdunes 579 So. 2d 452 La. 1991
State v. Ventress 578 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Joseph 577 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
When these restrictions are placed on a sentence by law, as in the case at bar, and the trial judge fails to impose them, the sentence is “illegally lenient.” (La.App.
State v. Sweet 575 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
920(2), 880 and 882A; (La.
State v. Vanderlinder 575 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Hunt 573 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Harris 573 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. James 573 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Toomer 572 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Neville 572 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Jenkins 573 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Allen 571 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Waldrop 571 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Carter 569 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Brownfield 569 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Reaves 569 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Yet, the state having failed to complain, from acting to correct this obviously illegal sentence.
State v. Jamison 565 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Vailes 564 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Dawson 560 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Hadwin 559 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Rose 557 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Arrington 556 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Mayeux 556 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Albert 553 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. West 553 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Anderson 547 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
However, from correcting this error.
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Failure to deny probation, parole, or suspension of sentence is favorable to Collins, and, this Court cannot correct the error since the error is favorable to Collins and the prosecutor has not complained that the sentence is illegally lenient.
State v. Taylor 545 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Bridges 545 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Tyler 544 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Restrepo 544 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Batiste, supra.
State v. Jarmon 543 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Although defendant’s $1,000 fine is too lenient, it appears this court cannot correct the error because it is favorable to defendant, and the prosecutor has not complained that the sentence is illegally lenient.