DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lombard, 486 So. 2d 106.

238 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Wilson Locke, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In support of his argument that the evidence is only sufficient to establish manslaughter, and State ex rel.
  • State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
  • State v. Free 127 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 44,977 (La.App.2d Cir.1/27/10), , writ denied, 2010-0368 (La.9/24/10), .
  • State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Wills 125 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
  • State v. Carmouche 117 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal James Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thornton 111 So. 3d 1130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 44,977 (La.App.2d.
  • State v. Carey 110 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thompson 106 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 44,977 (La.App.2d Cir.1/27/10), , writ denied, 10-0368 (La.9/24/10), .
  • State v. Tillman 104 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Rodney Ian Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Barnes 93 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryce Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Ellis, supra, (La.App.
  • State v. Perkins 85 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Ellis, supra, (La.App.
  • State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    14:27A provides: “Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose.” *68 where the Court found that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support only a conviction of manslaughter, not the second degree murder ve
  • State v. Moore 75 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Johnson 57 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Robinson 57 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: [T]he presence of “sudden passion” or “heat of blood” distinguishes manslaughter from murder.
  • State v. Patterson 63 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Lewis 48 So. 3d 1073 La. 2010
    Given that factual premise, the majority concluded that although defendant did not claim at trial that he had been provoked and fired in the heat of passion, or make any claim on appeal that the evidence otherwise revealed those essentially mitigatory factors which may reduce the degree of a homicide from murder to manslaughter, the evidence at trial supported the verdict of manslaughter because it could have sustained a verdict for second degree murder *1077 defined as a specific intent homicid
  • State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, explained the distinction between manslaughter and murder: [T]he presence of “sudden passion” or “heat of blood” distinguishes manslaughter from murder.
  • State v. Kelly 46 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: [T]he presence of “sudden passion” or “heat of blood” distinguishes manslaughter from murder.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
  • State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Williams 32 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Scott 26 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Morris 22 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE In his first assignment of error, defendant argues that he was entitled to a manslaughter verdict because he established by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted in a “sudden passion” or “heat of blood.” He also argues that the jury was irrational to return a murder verdict, rather than a manslaughter verdict, because the victim was
  • State v. Triggs 16 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    -11 (La.1986) (Citations and footnote omitted).
  • State v. Bauman 15 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Lawson, 08-123 (La.App.
  • State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Christian 984 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Ellis, supra , (La.App.
  • State v. Ross 973 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Brown 968 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Fuller 962 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Ellis 961 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lang 960 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 8/23/84), writ denied, to suggest that a manslaughter conviction would be more appropriate.