Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lombard, 486 So. 2d 106.

238 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Smith 571 So. 2d 133 La. 1990
State v. Camp 571 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Waxler 569 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Moore 568 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Heck 560 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Ebarb 558 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Willis 552 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Bridges 545 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. White 544 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
since "sudden passion" and "heat of blood" are not elements of the crime, the State does not have the burden of proving them.
State v. Del Carpio 537 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Carlin 529 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
but the instant facts and circumstances differ.
State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
In support of her contention that the facts of this case only support a conviction of manslaughter, appeal on remand for resentencing (La.App.
State v. Odom 529 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Gremillion 529 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Holley 528 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Livas 527 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
at 111 (La., 1986) wherein they stated: (i)n reviewing defendant's claim, this court must determine whether a rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found that the mitigatory factors were not established by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Theard 527 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Quinn 526 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Taylor 525 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
State v. Maddox 522 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Cheatham 519 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
at 111 (La., 1986) wherein they stated: (i)n reviewing defendant's claim, this court must determine whether a rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found that the mitigatory factors were not established by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Schenck 513 So. 2d 1159 La. 1987
State v. LeBlanc, 506 So.2d at 1201 ; affirmed on remand, (La.App.
State v. Hersman 511 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
which reduced a second degree murder conviction to manslaughter because the crime was committed in a sudden passion or heat of blood, and other Supreme Court opinions overruling trial jury findings concerning specific intent.
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling in State v. Mattheson, 407 So.2d at 1150 , in which it rejected a claim for defense witness immunity.
State v. LeBlanc 506 So. 2d 1197 La. 1987
State v. Edge 504 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
In support of his contention, a case in which the court modified a verdict of second degree and rendered a judgment of manslaughter.
State v. Butler 503 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
citing Jackson v. Virginia and other cases discussing the scope of appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict.
State v. Ruff 504 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Lombard 501 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Landry 499 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Because of the fight between the defendant and the victim, the defendant maintains that the homicide was mitigated by "hot blood or sudden passion" such that the reviewing court may reduce the second degree murder to manslaughter
State v. Price 498 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ducksworth 496 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Arabie 496 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986