Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lombard, 486 So. 2d 106.

238 citing documents.

State v. Reeves 696 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Crochet 693 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Whins 692 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. McClain 685 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Lewis 685 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Bates 683 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Pittman, 93-0892 (La.App.
State v. Thames 681 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Johnese 674 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Smith 672 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Piazza 668 So. 2d 1125 La. 1996
State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
in support of his assertion that mitigating factors may serve to negate the requisite specific *647 intent and reduce the degree of the crime.
State v. Allen 664 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-111 (La.1986); State v. Thorne, 633 So.2d at 777 ; State v. Holliday, 623 So.2d at 130 .
State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Golson 658 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Distinguished State v. Valdetero 648 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-109 (La.1986); -893 (La.1982).
State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
Therefore, defendant argues, (La.
State v. Clark 643 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Stewart 641 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Riley 637 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Clark 637 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Price 635 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Pittman 636 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-111 (La.1986); (La.App.
State v. Thorne 633 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Robinson at 410 ; -111 (La.1986), appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Copeland 631 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Straughter 630 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
[State v. Vivian] Heck, [ (La.App.
State v. Journet 629 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Riley 623 So. 2d 1289 La. 1993
State v. Holliday 623 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-111 (La.1986); (La.App.
State v. McCray 621 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Dixon 620 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Ducote 614 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Rader 609 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Gachot 609 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Mayho 601 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Robinson 598 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Jack 596 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Overton 596 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-111 (La.1986); (La.App.
State v. Ducre 596 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Trimble 589 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Green 588 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Moody 587 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Renney 586 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Nugent 580 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
The Louisiana Supreme Court, discusses manslaughter as follows, at pages 110 and 111: "Manslaughter is a homicide which would be either first or second degree murder, but the offense is committed in sudden passion or heat of blood immediately caused by provocation sufficient to deprive an average person of his self control and cool ref
State v. Bacon 578 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Temple 572 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990