Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rosiere, 488 So. 2d 965.

535 citing documents.

State v. Morrison 582 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Video Joe, Inc. 578 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Bruce 577 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Harris 577 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson 575 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
as follows: It is not the function of an appellate court to assess credibility or reweigh the evidence.
State v. Mitchell 572 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Hunter 571 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Dietrich 567 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Burrow 565 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Honore 564 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Jacobs 558 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Woolridge 555 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Odom 554 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sharlhorne 554 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. West 553 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 552 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jones, supra; (La.App.
State v. Westmoreland 551 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Thus, the reviewing court is not permitted “to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” State v. Mussall, supra
State v. Roberts 550 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Dunn 548 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Washington 546 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Davis 546 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Muse 548 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Talbert 543 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 543 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Jackson 543 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Greene 542 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Davis 540 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Gabriel 542 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth an explanation of the Brady rule: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Sheldon 541 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hickman 539 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. French 538 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Meredith 536 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Burger 531 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Vinet 529 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Porretto, supra.
State v. Abrams 527 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 527 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Dewhirst 527 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Marsh 527 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Lee 526 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 *451 (1979)
State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
This court then went on to state: “ the Louisiana Supreme Court, commenting on appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence, stated: ‘...
State v. Joseph 524 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mussall 523 So. 2d 1305 La. 1988
State v. Allen 526 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gilmore 522 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Hudnall 522 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 522 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988