Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rosiere, 488 So. 2d 965.

535 citing documents.

State v. Brock 521 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
as follows: "The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia [ 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 524 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Deer 519 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hall 519 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Gilbert 520 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Easley 517 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Domingue 517 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Jackson 520 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Kennington 515 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Busch 515 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
2211 , 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); (La.App.
State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. LaGarde 513 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Reed 512 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The constitutional standard for testing the sufficiency of evidence, enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia requires that a conviction be based on proof sufficient for any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, to find the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State v. O'Pry 511 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Louisiana Supreme Court, commenting on appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence, stated: “...
State v. Baham 509 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Mangrum 509 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State, in Interest of Malter 508 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Wright 506 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Davis 505 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Appellate review for minimal constitutional sufficiency of evidence is a limited one restricted by the standard developed in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Tullier 504 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 504 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Ruff 504 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Myre 502 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Williams 500 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Fernandez 499 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Malveaux 499 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Due process requires no greater burden.”
State v. Price 498 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ducksworth 496 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Arabie 496 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Banks 496 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Deboue 496 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
(La.1985), our Supreme Court discussed the purpose of the Brady rule: The Brady rule is based on the requirement of due process.
State v. Whittaker 496 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)