DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Counterman, 475 So. 2d 336.

297 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Dixon, 768 So.2d at 101-102 (footnote omitted), this court stated: sets forth the procedure which should be followed to obtain the right to file an out-of-time appeal.
  • State v. Smith 936 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Dixon, 768 So.2d at 101-102 (footnote omitted), this court stated: sets forth the procedure which should be followed to obtain the right to file an out-of-time appeal.
  • State v. Allen 930 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the trial court should have treated the motion as an application for post-conviction relief and given the state an opportunity to respond.
  • State v. Gordon 928 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Dashawn D. Herron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Herron 930 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Joseph King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. King 924 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smith 926 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jupiter 922 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5th Cir.10/28/97), , writ denied, 97-2954 (La.4/3/98)
  • State v. Jackson 919 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Thereafter, the defendant filed a timely application for post conviction relief on his Crosby plea
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Thomas 909 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward Fuselier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Fuselier 908 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Adams 907 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. J.E.D. 907 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Gray 902 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul John Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Frank 898 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jackson 895 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Cole 900 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State ex rel. Brown v. State 896 So. 2d 45 La. 2005
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”).
  • State Ex Rel. Mead v. State 891 So. 2d 680 La. 2005
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either "the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defendant attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.") In all other respects the application is denied.
  • State ex rel. Mead v. State 891 So. 2d 680 La. 2005
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defendant attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”) In all other respects the application is denied.
  • State v. Cooper 871 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Guilbeau 869 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Girod 867 So. 2d 672 La. 2004
  • State ex rel. Carracci v. State 862 So. 2d 972 La. 2004
  • State v. Roberts 864 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State Ex Rel. Clavelle v. State 861 So. 2d 186 La. 2003
    which recognized that a trial court "may grant post conviction relief reinstating defendant's constitutional right to appeal after the time for appealing has elapsed."
  • State v. Mickel 864 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Taylor, 03-127, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 861 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Taylor, 03-127, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 848 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State ex rel. Gallegos v. State 839 So. 2d 22 La. 2003
  • State ex rel. Pearson v. State 836 So. 2d 82 La. 2003
    (Out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”) (emphasis added); see also State v. Guillory, 99-0400 (L
  • State v. Armant 839 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Gassenberger 836 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Charles 827 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Brooks 817 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant who fails to make a Motion for Appeal within the time provided in Article 914 loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a Motion for Appeal.
  • State v. Gilliam 807 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State ex rel. Bonnee v. State 803 So. 2d 980 La. 2001
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a hearing at which it will deter *981 (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal”)
  • State ex rel. Stevenson v. State 801 So. 2d 1069 La. 2001
  • State v. Graham 799 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In the interest of judicial economy
  • State v. Powell 783 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Munson 782 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: However, when a defendant fails to make a motion for appeal within the time provided in Article 914, he loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a motion for appeal in the trial court.
  • In re Harris 774 So. 2d 963 La. 2000
    the parties recognized Mr. Haynes could still seek post-conviction relief with a motion for out-of-time appeal.
  • State Ex Rel. Egana v. State 771 So. 2d 638 La. 2000
    In addition, the court is directed to review relator's district court pleading of August, 1999, (filing seeking out-of-time appeal but with improper caption "should have been treated as an application for post-conviction relief.").
  • State v. Tribbit 767 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [2] The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed this Court's decision on March 26, 1999, ordering the district court to "appoint counsel for purposes of holding a "