Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Counterman, 475 So. 2d 336.

297 citing documents.

  • State v. Bowen 767 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant who fails to make a motion for appeal within the time provided in Article 914 loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a motion for appeal.
  • State v. Dixon 768 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Egana 758 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Williams, 98-819 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 755 So. 2d 245 La. 2000
    This case is remanded to the district court for a hearing on relator’s right to an out-of-time appeal under State v. Counterman
  • State ex rel. Wood v. State 755 So. 2d 245 La. 2000
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a hearing at which it will determine whether relator is entitled to an out- *246 (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”).
  • State v. Verdin 752 So. 2d 877 La. 2000
  • State v. Owens 763 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    art. 914, having been taken more than five days after rendition of the judgment and after an untimely motion for reconsideration of sentence, we will entertain the appeal in the interest of judicial economy
  • State ex rel. Morgan v. State 748 So. 2d 460 La. 1999
    (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”) (emphasis added); see also State ex rel.
  • State ex rel. Charles v. State 747 So. 2d 555 La. 1999
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State ex rel. Lee v. State 747 So. 2d 561 La. 1999
    art. 926(A); -40 (La.1986).
  • State ex rel. Guillory v. State 745 So. 2d 627 La. 1999
  • State Ex Rel. Guillory v. State 745 So. 2d 627 La. 1999
  • State ex rel. Jones v. State 741 So. 2d 4 La. 1999
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State ex rel. Tribbit v. State 739 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a -
  • State ex rel. Taylor v. State 737 So. 2d 737 La. 1999
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State v. Williams 727 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a defendant loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a motion for appeal after failing to make a motion for appeal within the time provided in Article 914.
  • State v. Hollins 726 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Ockmand, 95-413 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Davis v. State 726 So. 2d 916 La. 1998
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State ex rel. Fabro v. State 723 So. 2d 425 La. 1998
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State v. Smith 723 So. 2d 427 La. 1998
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a hearing at which it will determine whether relator is entitled to an out-of-time appeal under the rule of State *428 v. Counterman
  • State v. Ginn 718 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Orgeron 708 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Davis 708 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Sly 701 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State ex rel. Coleman v. State 699 So. 2d 78 La. 1997
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State v. Jonas 698 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In the interest of judicial economy, we entertain the appeal, (La.
  • State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
  • Brouillette v. State 680 So. 2d 639 La. 1996
    If relator did not receive an appeal, the court is ordered to consider relator’s -40 (La.1985).
  • State ex rel. Gray v. Whitley 679 So. 2d 414 La. 1996
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State v. Labiche 680 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Rolland 673 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [W]hen a defendant fails to make a motion for appeal within the time provided in Article 914, he loses the right to obtain an appeal by simply filing a motion for appeal in the trial court.
  • State v. Demouchet 677 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Mathews 677 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Razza 671 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cole 666 So. 2d 1092 La. 1996
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State v. Ockmand 665 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State ex rel. Hudson v. State 661 So. 2d 1371 La. 1995
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a
  • State ex rel. Parker v. Whitley 634 So. 2d 366 La. 1994
  • State ex rel. Watts v. State 631 So. 2d 1154 La. 1994
  • State v. Gibbs 620 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State ex rel. Counterman v. Whitley 611 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State ex rel. Landry v. State 605 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
    495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)
  • State v. Brinson 602 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State ex rel. Gates v. Jones 598 So. 2d 362 La. 1992
    Granted and remanded to the district court in order to consider relator’s
  • State v. Stoufflet 592 So. 2d 1327 La. 1992
  • State ex rel. Lindon v. State 592 So. 2d 1309 La. 1992
  • State v. Edwards 590 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    art. 915.1 A is to preserve the defendant's constitutional right of appeal.
  • State ex rel. Green v. Whitley 581 So. 2d 669 La. 1991
    The district court is ordered to consider its April 18, 1990
  • State v. Martin 580 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991