Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Westerfield v. LaFleur, 493 So. 2d 600.

68 citing documents.

Randy Pilet v. Pilet Distributors, the Estate of Steve Pilet, Big Boy Distributor, L.L.C., Allstate Insurance Company, Milton … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Khiry Cosey on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Corbin Hilliard and Allyssa Hilliard Individually and on Behalf of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Rogers v. Integrated Exploration & Prod., LLC 265 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4/11/94), , 1183 (citing Westerfield v. LaFleur , , 605 (La.
Parker v. Am. W. Home Ins. Co. 261 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Kerri A. Latour v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Cody Parker v. American Western Home Insurance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Latour v. Allstate Ins. Co. 262 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. Brown 219 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
King v. Old Republic Insurance Co. 200 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
mmary judgment declaring a lack of coverage under an insurance policy may not be rendered unless there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy, when applied to the undisputed material facts shown by the evidence supporting the motion, under which coverage could be afforded.” Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd., 93-1480, p. 2 (La.4/11/94), ().
Breazeale v. T.T. 117 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Mistich v. Weeks 107 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Doucette v. Louisiana Citizens Coastal Plan 96 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Mason v. Bankers Insurance Group 90 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Tim Wagner v. Inn of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Our supreme court has held that “summary judgment may not be rendered declaring lack of coverage unless there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy, when applied to the undisputed material facts shown by the evidence supporting the motion, under which coverage could be afforded.”
Wagner v. Inn of Lake Charles 49 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Our supreme court has held that “summary judgment may not be rendered declaring lack of coverage unless there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy, when applied to the undisputed material facts shown by the evidence supporting the motion, under which coverage could be afforded.”
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Gus Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Watson 7 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Geneva Vidrine v. Jason Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Vidrine v. LaFleur 979 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Canterberry v. Chamblee 953 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd., 93-1480 (La.4/11/94), ; (La.
Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
We have held that a “[s]ummary judgment declaring no coverage under an insurance policy may only be rendered when there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy which would provide coverage under the undisputed facts of the case.” Landry, 688 So.2d at 1128; see also
Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Landry, 688 So.2d at 1128 ; see also
Ryder v. Jones 916 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Billie Jean Gilbert and Joseph Gilbert v. Marlow Reynoso La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gilbert v. Reynoso 917 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
McFarland v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 902 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
McFarland v. SOUTH. FARM BUR. CAS. INS. CO. 902 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Proshee v. Shree, Inc. 893 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Dennis Proshee v. Shree, Inc. D/B/A Southerner Motel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. v. Transcend Services, Inc. 884 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Calvin v. Janbar Enterprises, Inc. 856 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Smith v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois 807 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Ott v. LPK Systems, Inc. 812 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Townsend v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 793 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd., 93-1480 (La.4/11/94), ; (La.
Fournette v. Tran 792 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Samia Companies v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 789 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd., 93-1480, at 2 (La.4/11/94), , KLL Consultants, Inc. v. Aetna Cas.
Amos v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. 773 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Aucoin v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 771 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Matthews v. Pete Mercer Const. 758 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
and Day v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., (La.App.
Ashy v. Migues 760 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
a minor child was struck by an underinsured motorist while she was crossing a highway to board a school bus.
Adams v. Thomason 753 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
KLL CONSULTANTS v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 738 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the court stated that a summary judgment which finds that an insurance policy does not provide coverage may not be rendered unless there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy, when applied to the undisputed material facts shown by the evidence supporting the motion.
Gauthreaux v. Allstate Insurance Co. 731 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the court considered the applicable jurisprudence and stated that “...
Burke v. Thibodeaux 726 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the court stated that a summary judgment which finds that an insurance policy does not provide coverage may not be rendered unless there is no reasonable interpretation of the policy, when applied to the undisputed material facts shown by the evidence supporting the motion.
Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dronet v. Safeway Insurance Co. 703 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 700 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
in determining policy language may cover a child "entering into" a school bus when the accident occurred.
Maldonado v. Porter 694 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 665 La. 1997
For example, the UM policy at issue defined "occupying" to mean "in or upon or entering into or alighting from."