Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1, 496 So. 2d 270.

248 citing documents.

Loveday v. Travelers Ins. Co. 585 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
"The appellate court, in determining whether the trial court erred in granting the JNOV as to quantum, once again uses the criteria set forth in Scott, supra, [ Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ], i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or abusively low.
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 583 So. 2d 829 La. 1991
In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. Bank 583 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
No. 1, (quoting Blum v. New Orleans Pub.
Boudreaux v. SCHWEGMANN GIANT SUPERMKT. 585 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, summarized the standard as follows: Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969), decided by an en banc court, set out the criteria to be followed on motions for directed verdict and motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in the federal courts.
Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Lilly v. Allstate Ins. Co. 577 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hutchinson v. Wal-Mart, Inc. 573 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Reilly v. Dynamic Exploration, Inc. 571 So. 2d 140 La. 1990
No. 1, Breithaupt, supra .
Hopkins v. Travasos 569 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Crowther v. Kmart Corp. 568 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Charles, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the standard for a J.N.O.V.
Peter v. Allstate Ins. Co. 563 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
The standard for increasing a jury's award by JNOV is set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, : When there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.
Trans Global Alloy Ltd. v. First Nat. Bank 564 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
TL James & Co. v. Kenner Landing, Inc. 562 So. 2d 914 La. 1990
Harris v. Tenneco Oil Co. 563 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Charles, , 274 FN 11 (La.1986).
Brossette v. Professional Transportation 562 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Charles, the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard to be used in the consideration of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict: “When there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.
Palermo v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 558 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
Dist No. 1, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Baio v. Haggerty 558 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Bruce v. Rogers Oil Tool Services, Inc. 556 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Kennedy v. Parrino 555 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lawrence v. Dunaway 554 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (when there is either no genuine issue of fact or when "reasonable minds could not differ," the judgment notwithstanding the verdict is appropriate).
Petitto v. McMichael 552 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
No. 1, the Supreme Court, quoting from Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969), stated: "When `the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, granting of the motions [directed verdict and
Lopez v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. 546 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
No. 1, the Supreme Court, quoting from Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969), stated: "When `the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, granting of the motions [directed verdict and
Jones v. Northbrook Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
The Supreme Court in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
Adams v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 543 So. 2d 480 La. 1989
Directional Wireline Services, Inc. v. Tillett 540 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rickerson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 543 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Snell v. United Parcel Services, Inc. 543 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
No. 1, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Doming v. K-Mart Corp. 540 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Thomas v. Hartford Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Charles, was cited as authority for the holding.
Adams v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 533 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Creel v. SA Tarver & Son Tractor Co. 537 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
No. 1, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Diaz v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 533 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Streeter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 533 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
No. 1, Bellard v. CNA Ins.
Gardner v. Campbell 532 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Charles, and cases cited therein.
Barfield v. Jacobs 527 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
is set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, : "When there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.
Cascio v. City of Monroe 530 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Giraud v. Johns 523 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Charles, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the standard for a judgment N.O. V. “requires that the motion be granted only when the evidence points so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of the moving party that reasonable men could not reach different conclusions, not merely when there is a preponderance of evid
LeBleu v. Dynamic Indus. Constructors, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Keyworth v. Southern Baptist Hospitals, Inc. 524 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Charles, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the standard for a J.N.O.V.
Willis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 524 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Dill v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 522 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Zeagler v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. 521 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
No. 1, at 273 (La.1986), citing Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969).
Jinks v. Wright 520 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Webb v. Goodley 512 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Bellard v. CNA Ins. Co. 503 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
No. 1, the Supreme Court stated: "When there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.
Hastings v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 498 So. 2d 713 La. 1986