Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1, 496 So. 2d 270.

248 citing documents.

Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co. 641 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Choyce v. SISTERS 642 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
App. 5th Cir.1986), reversed on other grounds
Fleming v. Smith 638 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Vicknair v. Dimitryadis 640 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Terro v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 631 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ], supra.
Kirby v. Langston's Furniture & Appliance 631 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Chenniliaro v. Kaufman & Broad Home Sys. 636 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1], supra [ ].
Griffin v. Manning 633 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ] [(La.1986)], supra.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Sanders 628 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 628 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Willis v. Louisiana Power & Light Company, (La.App.
Theriot v. Allstate Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1337 La. 1993
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Jackson v. Kansas City Southern Ry. 619 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
No. 1, the Supreme Court explains that the granting of a motion for JNOV is proper when the trial court believes that *857 the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Talamo v. Shad 619 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.App.
Braud v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Charles Parish, the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Thompson v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 617 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Charles, the Supreme Court set out the standard to be used in considering a judgment notwithstanding the verdict: When there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.
Roland v. Tedesco 616 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Charles, Willis v. Louisiana Power & Light Company, (La.App.
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
Gray v. Texaco, Inc. 610 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Scott [ v. Hospital Service Direct No. 1, ] supra [ ].
Sumrall v. Sumrall 612 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Pritchett v. Martin 612 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Haygood v. Wood 610 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Broussard v. Lovelace 610 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Leggett v. Fritchie 610 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Lougon v. Era Aviation, Inc. 609 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1986), writ denied, $25,000.00 affirmed, where a spouse's deteriorating back condition caused a fear of paralysis and disruption of family life; Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, [ ], $50,000.00 affirmed, where a spouse's permanent vascular and orthopedic injuries produced a 100% functional disability; (La.App.
Cash v. Charter Marketing Co. 607 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
No. 1, the Supreme Court, quoting from Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969), explains the standard as follows: "When `the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, granting of the mot
Gauthier v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. 608 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
No. 1, the standard is set out as follows: "When `the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, granting of the motions [directed verdict and judgment n.o.v.]
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Dufour v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO. 610 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co. 606 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ], supra.
Martin v. G & a LTD. 604 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Doe v. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS 602 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Easton v. Chevron Industries, Inc. 602 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Daigle v. Audi of America, Inc. 598 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Also see Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Hebert v. Angelle 600 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Blankenship v. Champion Insurance Co. 599 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.App.
Pattison v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Clayton v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 599 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Tabarelli v. Allstate Insurance Co. 598 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Bowers v. Viator 597 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Smith v. American Indem. Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
Fleming v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 595 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Miley v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The appellate court, in determining whether the trial court erred in granting the JNOV as to quantum, once again uses the criteria set forth in Scott, supra [ v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ], i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or abusively low.
Anmac Foundation v. St. Patrick Hosp. 594 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
5th Cir.1986), reversed on other grounds
West Jefferson Levee Dist. v. Mayronne 595 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Clark v. Ark-La-Tex Auction, Inc. 593 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Gibson v. Bossier City General Hosp. 594 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Willis v. Louisiana Power & Light Company, (La.App.
Carter v. BRMAP 591 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Charles, Roy & (La.App.
Conino v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 586 So. 2d 1391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991