Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McLean v. Hunter, 495 So. 2d 1298.

212 citing documents.

Joanne Grafton and Billy Grafton, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Shelly Grafton v. Elizabeth Hammond … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
William J. Holliday v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, MMR Group, Inc., and Jeremy Bruser La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Jahmal Tillman and Jirus Tillman Individually and O/B/O Rose Tillman v. Lammico, Practice Protection Trust Fund, the State … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Rodney Crayton v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Oris Latour And Virgie Latour v. Steamboats, Llc La. 2023
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Elise Howell v. Wallace Overton; Carolann Overton; Tracy Overton; Ashley Overton Hughes; Faulkner Animal Hospital, LLC; Forrest Faulkner; … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
In Re: Dative Tutorship of The Minor Child Bailey Moore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Karen Cohen Kinnett v. Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. 2022
Karen Cohen Kinnett v. Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. 2022
Succession of Bettye Lou Thomas Moore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Shauna Rayburn, Individually and on Behalf of Mordecai Rayburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Teresa Jeffries v. Prime Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Victoria Roach v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Mohab Said v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Et Al. La. 2021
Ronald Hicks v. USAA General Indemnity Company, Robert L. Harger, Jr., R.L. Harger and Associates, Inc. and Harger … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Mohab Said v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
However, “[w]hen a jury is given incorrect instructions in the law, or when a trial court makes a consequential error in the exclusion of evidence, no weight should be accorded the judgment of the trial court which implements the jury verdict.”
Martin Baack and Brenda Baack v. Michael McIntosh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Kimberly Chiasson, Individually and on behalf of her minor son, Cameron Chiasson v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Dillon Romero and Kristian Breaux v. Roger Lagrange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5 Cir. 3/28/01); writ denied, 01– 1735 (La.12/14/01)
Chyrisse Staten, Individually, And O/B/O Mother, Margaret Staten v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center, Dr. Robin Sharp, Dr. Arthur … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Jody Stelly v. Joseph Roderick Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
St. Bernard Port v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 255 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1304 (La.1986) ; , 918 (La.1986) ; , 758 (La.1980) and cases cited therein.
Spann v. Gerry Lane Enters., Inc. 256 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See McLean v. Hunter , , 1304 (La.
Yokum v. Funky 544 Rhythm & Blues Cafe 248 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 9/21/11), , 477 (quoting McLean v. Hunter , , 1305 (La.
Jeff Mercer, LLC v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 222 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Williams v. Parish of St. Bernard 206 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 4/16/14), -57 ; (La.
McMillion v. East Jefferson General Hospital 193 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 3/28/01) ; , writ denied, 01-1735 (La.12/14/01)
Knoten v. Westbrook 193 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 94-1252, p. 7 (La.2/20/95)
Hilkirk v. Johnson 183 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hightower v. Schwartz 151 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Without a proffer, appellate courts have no way of ascertaining the nature |3of the excluded testimony.”
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Roberts v. Rudzis 146 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mazzini v. Strathman 140 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also, (Explaining that purpose of a proffer is to preserve evidence excluded by the trial court so that the evidence is available for appellate review).
Kieffer v. Plunkett-Kuspa 138 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Berthelot v. Stalder 132 So. 3d 1249 La. 2014
See Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94)
Riverside Recycling, LLC v. BWI Companies 112 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Battaglia v. Chalmette Medical Center, Inc. 126 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Howard v. Vincent 88 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Harper v. Minor 86 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 85 So. 3d 593 La. 2012
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), , 747 rev’d in part, on other grounds, 96-3028 (La.7/1/97), , reh’g denied, 96-3028 (La.9/19/97), )
Roger Vestal v. Cynthia D. Kirkland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Vestal v. Kirkland 81 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Clayton Bias v. Dr. Frederico Del Toro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Bias v. Del Toro 77 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Ohm Lounge, L.L.C. v. Royal St. Charles Hotel, L.L.C. 75 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Indeed, the purpose of mandating the trial court to allow the excluded evidence to be proffered is so that “the testimony (whatever its nature) is available for appellate review.”
Cusimano v. Port Esplanade Condominium Ass'n 55 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(“The very purpose of requiring a proffer is to preserve excluded testimony so that the testimony (whatever its nature) is available for appellate review.”).
State ex rel. D.R. 51 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 94-1252 (La.2/20/95), ; Barriere, supra.
Chauvin v. Chauvin 49 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Key v. Monroe City School Board 32 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Inc., 2006-0983 (La.11/29/06), ; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 *1149 (La.2/6/98)