Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co., 502 So. 2d 1034.

130 citing documents.

Robert Alexander v. Dresser, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Phillip Hebert and Brian Hebert v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Cnh Industrial … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Nohc, Inc. v. Erroll G. Williams, Assessor, Parish of Orleans; Norman White, Director of Finance for the City … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Denise Anding O/B/O of The Minor Children, Marcus Anding, Deaunte Brown & Alyssa Anding v. Lieutenant Scott Ferguson, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
John F. Schwegmann, John F. Schwegmann, as the Trustee of the John F. Schwegmann Trust 2 and a … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.
Katrina Sylvan and Anthony Johnson v. BRFHH Monroe, LLC d/b/a University Health Shreveport, LLC; University Health Shreveport; Shilpadevi … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Duplessis Buick GMC Truck, Inc. v. Michael Chauncey, David Richard, Gretna Used Car Outlet, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., La.
Karen May,et Al. v. the Succession of Mayo Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Co., superseded on other grounds as stated in Jenkins v. Sterns, 11-1170 (La.
Renton Properties, LLC Versus 213 Upland, LLC, Margaret W. Tonti, Robert J. Tonti, Ohio Management, LLC, Corporate Realty … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
citing Plaquemines Parish Commission Council, (La.
Hunt Guillot and Associates, LLC v. Terry Clark, John Jack, Gary Evans, Kirk Trosclair and Ronald McClung La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
3d 234, citing, Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., (La.
In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Blanchard v. Gerry's Place, Inc. 258 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Wells , supra at 1150, quoting Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc. , , 1054-55 (La.
John Brandt Baxter, in His Capacity as the Independent Administrator of the Succession of August C. Baxter v. … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
Baxter v. Lewis 247 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
" Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc. , , 1040 (La.1987), quoting Toombs v. Daniels , 361 N.W.2d 801 , 809 (Minn.1985).
Daniel P. McCauley v. Dr. Malcolm Stubbs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., Corsey v. State Dep’t. of Corrections, ).1 Plaintiff cites Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, p. 8 (La.
McCauley v. Stubbs 245 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. , ; Corsey v. State Dep't.
Parker v. Wolkart 243 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Alexander v. La. State Board of Private Investigator Examiners 211 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/26/02), ; Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., (La.
Succession of McKinley 206 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
Lapuyade v. Rawbar, Inc. 190 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
These categories allow “the courts to weigh the ‘equitable nature of the circumstances in each individual case’ to determine whether prescription will be tolled.” Wells, supra at 1150 , quoting Plaquemines Parish Commission Council, -56 (La.
Felix v. Safeway Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
( ); see also Fontenot v. ABC Ins.
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., , 1056 n. 52.
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
These categories allow “the courts to weigh the ‘equitable nature of the circumstances in each individual case’ to determine whether prescription will be tolled.” Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232, p. 9 (La.3/30/12), *310 , quoting Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., .
Meiko Prevo v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections Division of Probation and … La. 2015
Although the jurisprudence has recognized four categories of contra non valentem, the focus of the instant case is on the third category, which applies “where the debtor himself has done some act effectually to prevent the creditor from availing himself of his cause of action.” Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.
Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 187 So. 3d 395 La. 2015
Although the jurisprudence has recognized four categories of contra non valentem, the focus of the instant case is on the third category, which applies “where the debtor himself has done some act effectually to prevent the creditor from availing himself of his cause of action.” Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.1987).
Prevo v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections Division of Probation & Parole 163 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
See Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in *21 Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170 (La.01/24/12), .
Robert v. Robert Management Co. 164 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., the Plaintiffs aver in their second assignment that the trial court erred in rejecting its argument that "RMC's failure to disclose its acts was critical to consideration of Plaintiffs’ investigation and knowledge of those acts, and thus to the defense of prescription.” In other words, the Plaintiffs claim
Johnson v. Allen 158 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., Inc., -55 (La.1987).
Albe v. City of New Orleans 150 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
But “[t]here is no question but that contra non valentem continues to be a viable exception to the running of Iiberative prescription in Louisiana.” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., *367 1056 (La.1987).
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc. 120 So. 3d 678 La. 2013
In Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., this Court held that "[tjhere is no question but that contra non valentem continues to be a viable exception to the running of liberative prescription in Louisiana.” This Court recognized the four instances where contra non valentem can be applied to prevent the running of prescription: (1) where ther
Hodges v. Reasonover 103 So. 3d 1069 La. 2012
Wells v. Zadeck 89 So. 3d 1145 La. 2012
Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., (La.
Jenkins v. Starns 85 So. 3d 612 La. 2012
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 at 11, (citing Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Comm’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., ).
Hines v. BROWNING-FERRIS, INC. 73 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Terrebonne Concrete, LLC v. CEC Enterprises, LLC 76 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Barcia v. Louisiana Medical Malpractice Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., see also, Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
Wells v. Zadeck 62 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Marin, supra; Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., (La.
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
Plaquemines Parish Com’n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., Inc., (quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985) (citations omitted)).
Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Priola Construction Corporation v. Profast Development Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/22/07), -48: A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
Priola Construction Corp. v. Profast Development Group, Inc. 21 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
rted by the supreme court’s definition of “fiduciary” as found in Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, pp. 6-7 (La.2/22/07), , 647-48: A fiduciary relationship has been described as “one that exists ‘when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.’ ” Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Inc., (quoting Anderson v. Thacher, 76 Cal.App.2d 50 , 172 P.2d 533, 543 (1946)).
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
No. 1, 99-2402, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9, n. 3 (La.10/21/97), n. 3 ; Whitnell v. Silverman, 95-0112, p. 6 (La.12/6/96), ; Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Novelaire Technologies, LLC v. Harrison 994 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), .
Cameron v. Bruce 981 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Co., writ denied, 97-0533 (La.04/18/97), .
Becnel v. Grodner 982 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
A fiduciary relationship has been described as "one that exists "when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.'" Plaquemines Parish Commission *895 Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., citing Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 974 So. 2d 1266 La. 2008
Scheffler , 06-1774 at p. 14, 950 So.2d at 652 "As we have frankly acknowledged: `In no relationship is the maxim that "no man can serve two masters" more rigidly *1272 enforced than in the attorney-client relationship.'" Scheffler , 06-1774 at p. 13, 950 So.2d at 651 , quoting Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc.
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
In Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., -55 (La.1987), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized four instances where contra non valentum is applied to prevent the running of prescription: (1) where there is some legal cause which prevented the courts or their officials from taking cognizance of or acting on the plaintiff's action; (2) where there was som
Sampson v. DCI of Alexandria 970 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
A fiduciary relationship has been described as "one that exists `when confidence *60 is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other.'" Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Company, Inc., quoting Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801, 809 (Minn.1985).