Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Gracianette v. Emeril's Restaurant 761 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. Stevenson 756 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Aymond v. Aymond 758 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman 758 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Freeman , 93-1530 at p. 5, 630 So.2d at 737-38
Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 756 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Boggs v. Voss, 31,965 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/16/99), ; Chambers v. Graybiel, 25,840 (La.App.2d Cir.6/22/94), , writ denied, 94-1948 (La.10/28/94), .
Barrociere v. Batiste 752 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Lewis v. State, through DOTD, (La.
Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Ardoin 758 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Freeman [v. Poulan/Weed Eater], 93-1530 at p. 5 [(La.1/14/94)], 630 So.2d [733] at 737-738
Perez v. State ex rel. Crescent City Connection 753 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Joseph v. Dickerson 754 So. 2d 912 La. 2000
McCalmont v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 748 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Perry v. Anderson 751 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court announced a two-part test for the reversal of a factfinder's determination: (1) The Appellate Court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and (2) The Appellate Court must further determine that the recor
Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
McDaniel v. Green 755 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Kelly v. Riles 751 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Manning v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. 753 So. 2d 163 La. 1999
Wainwright v. Fontenot 750 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Phelps v. White, 94-267 (La.App.
King v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 747 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
New Orleans Firefighters Ass'n Local 632 v. City of New Orleans 750 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Livestock Producers, Inc. v. Littleton 748 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Touchard v. Slemco Electric Foundation 745 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Ducote v. Perry's Auto World, Inc. 745 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Metrejean v. Prudential Ins. Co. 761 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Succession of Gates 746 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bolden v. Rodgers 746 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Darnell v. Alcorn 757 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Page v. Page 762 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Stobart v. State, through Department of Transportation and Development, (La.
Fromholz v. Perrin 742 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Lacroix v. Lacroix 742 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Dolmo v. Williams 753 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
", Francis, supra, at 1048 .
LaCroix v. LaCroix 742 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Cormier v. Comeaux 748 So. 2d 1123 La. 1999
Alexander v. City of Baton Rouge 739 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Schopp v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 739 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Boggs v. Voss 741 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Edwards v. Daugherty 736 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Zagar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 747 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Lafleur v. Safeway Insurance Co. 741 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
unit denied after remand
Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 739 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
[1] *840 (La.1987); Morehead v. Ford Motor Company, 29,399 (La.App.2d Cir.5/21/97), , writ denied, 97-1865 (La.11/7/97), .
Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan 733 So. 2d 1198 La. 1999
4/16/87), , rehearing denied 5/28/87; Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
Jackson v. Scott Truck and Tractor, Inc. 736 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Morehead v. Ford Motor Company, 29,399 (La.App.2d Cir.5/21/97), , writ denied 97-1865 (La.11/7/97), .
Thomas v. Midland Risk Insurance Co. 731 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 In applying the duty/ the jury could have reasonably found that Defendant’s actions as he proceeded through the intersection of U.S. 171 and LA 3226 were a cause in fact of the accident, just as it could have found that Plaintiffs conduct was also a cause in fact of the collision.
Mixon v. Davis 732 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Roberts v. Benoit, supra ; (La.
Thielmier v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming 732 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Thomas v. Evangeline Parish School Bd. 733 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Meshell v. Lovell 732 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Crews v. Babin 732 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Liability for fault is subject to a : (1) Was the conduct in question a cause-in-fact of the resulting harm?