Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Marchand v. Woods 729 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Alderman v. Jacks 729 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Billiot v. Terrebonne Sheriff's Office 735 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Hirstius v. Bernos 729 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
and Development, 654 So.2d at 314 ().
Kimbrough v. Hirsch 736 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Americas Ins. Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co. 736 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Walters v. Greer 726 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Thompson v. Coates, 29,333, (La.App.
Jackson v. Palmer 727 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Williams v. Jackson Parish Hosp. 729 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2 Cir. 12/9/94), , writ granted, , 95-0038 (La.3/10/95), set aside, , 95-0038 (La.6/25/96), rehearing denied
Parfait v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 733 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Simpson v. Goodman 727 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Stobart v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development
Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc. 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Sportsman Store v. SONITROL SEC. SYSTEMS 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Read v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 725 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
In explaining his ruling
Pesson v. Reynolds 727 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hebert v. Brown Bottling Group, Inc. 719 So. 2d 1043 La. 1998
Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Moore v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 720 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Lannes v. Denny's Inc. 721 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
ted that “[t]he principles of appellate review do not require an appellate court to affirm the trier of fact’s refusal to accept as credible uncon-tradicted testimony or greatly preponderant objectively-corroborated testimony where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection and where the factual finding itself has been reached by overlooking applicable legal principles.” Butler v. Zapata Haynie Corp., 92-71 (La.App.
Minton v. Crawford 719 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Riggs v. LaJaunie 720 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Knight v. State 718 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Thompson v. Coates, supra .
Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 724 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Harvey v. Bogalusa Concrete, Inc. 719 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See Stobart v. State, through Department of Transportation and Development
Ledoux v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 43 La. 1998
Perow v. Lenzly 716 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Goodrich v. Caterpillar, Inc. 717 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Echo, Inc. v. Power Equipment Distributors, Inc. 719 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hopstetter v. Nichols 716 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Straughter v. Harnwell 715 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Caballero v. Catholic Mut. Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bass v. Allen Cannery Co., Inc. 715 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Benoit v. Frank's Casing Crew 713 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Freeman [v. Poulan/Weed Eater ], 93-1530 at p. 5 [ (La.1/14/94) ], 630 So.2d [733] at 737-38
Leger v. Coccaro 714 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882
Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Brister v. Continental Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Thompson v. Coates, supra .
Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
ed by the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which authorizes us to reverse a trial court's factual finding only if we find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court and that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, .
Jeanpierre v. Mikaelian 709 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Traweek v. Jackson 709 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Ly v. State, Through Department of Public Safety and Corrections, (La.App.
Kahlden v. Horseshoe Entertainment 709 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Freeman, 93-1530, 630 So.2d at 737-38
Clark v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Clark v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bell v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 707 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Broussard v. Mobile Home Repairs, Inc. 707 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Rosell, supra; Stobart, supra.
Brodtmann v. Duke 708 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport 706 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Russell v. Noullet 706 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Royal v. Cottles 705 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998