Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Dumas and Associates, Inc. v. Lewis Enterprises Inc. 704 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Thompson v. Coates, supra.
Powell v. Brookshire's Grocery Co., Inc. 705 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Bourque v. Audubon Ins. Co. 704 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Graves v. Page 703 So. 2d 566 La. 1997
this court stated the two-tier test for reversal on appellate review: (1) the appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and (2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearl
Aycock v. Jenkins Tile Co. 703 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Brown v. Coastal Const. & Engineering, Inc. 704 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See Stobart v. State, through Department of Transportation and Development
Bijeaux v. State, DOTD 702 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882
Guillory v. Guillory 702 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler 701 So. 2d 1308 La. 1997
Spell v. Conn Appliances, Inc. 702 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Freeman [ v. Poulan/Weed Eater ], 93-1530 at p. 5 [ (La.1/14/94) ], 630 So.2d [733] at 737-738
Duryea v. Handy 700 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Officer Handy admittedly threw a bag of beads very forcefully to the raised bleacher seats without looking to see if anyone was in his way, which led to his striking Duryea.
Morrison v. Morrison 699 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 700 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Centanni v. Spizer 699 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Co. v. American Rent-All, Inc.
Stroik v. Ponseti 699 So. 2d 1072 La. 1997
Kavanaugh v. Long 698 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Lewis v. State, 94-2370 (La.4/21/95), .
Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 700 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
the Supreme Court set forth a two-part test for reversing a factfinder's determination on appellate review: 1) The appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record es
Maddox v. Omni Drilling Corp. 698 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Boudoin v. NICHOLSON, BAEHR, ETC. 698 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Nichols v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 698 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal 696 So. 2d 551 La. 1997
Mullins v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 697 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 699 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Sur.
Hortman v. Louisiana Steel Works 696 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Fontenot v. JK Richard Trucking 696 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Grant v. Allstate Ins. Co. 696 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882
Ramos v. Ramos 697 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Western American Specialized Transportation Services, Inc. v. Chibberton 695 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the Supreme Court stated the two-tier test for reversal on appellate review: (1) [t]he appellate court must find from the record that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court, and (2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that *1061 the fi
Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Parker v. Centenary Heritage Manor Nursing Home, supra .
Williams v. Dean 694 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Thompson v. Coates 694 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America 692 So. 2d 1029 La. 1997
APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT Liability for fault is subject to a risk-duty analysis based on the following considerations outlined in Mart v. Hill, 86-2191, 86-2200 (La.4/16/87); : (1) Was the conduct in question a cause-in-fact of the resulting harm?
Tubre v. STATE, DOTD 693 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Marie v. John Deere Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bridges v. Bridges 692 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Broussard v. Romero 691 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Carter v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 690 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Baumgarten v. Daigle 689 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
that an appellate court is not required, to affirm the trier of fact’s refusal to accept as credible uncontradicted testimony or greatly preponderant objectively corroborated testimony where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection and where the factual finding itself has been reached by
Trahan v. McManus 689 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Theriot v. Bourg 691 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTD 690 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Tyler v. Rockwood Insurance Co. 690 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hardenstein v. COOK CONST. INC. 691 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Grant v. Allstate Insurance Co. 688 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882
Landry v. City of New Iberia 689 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rosell, supra; Stobart, supra.
Palermo v. Audubon Insurance Co. 689 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Prestenback v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 688 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Gould v. Gould 687 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997