Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Farrill v. Hammond State School 639 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Handy v. Richard's Cajun Country Food 640 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Breaux v. Larkin 637 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Brown v. Churchill & Thibaut, Inc. 637 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Cavalier v. Cain's Hydrostatic Testing, Inc. 637 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Reid v. State Through DOTD 637 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Orgeron v. Prescott 636 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Fontenot v. Fontenot 635 So. 2d 219 La. 1994
Prevost v. Eye Care and Surgery Center 635 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Stobart v. State, Department of Transportation and Development
Lee v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Harig v. State, Bd. of Elementary & Secondary Educ. 635 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Bozeman v. Reed 633 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hutzler v. Cole 633 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 634 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hodge v. Liquid Ventures 634 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Morris v. Allstate Ins. Co. 632 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Butler v. Zapata Haynie Corp. 633 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Sons v. Delaune 634 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater 630 So. 2d 733 La. 1994
Rosell, supra ; Stobart, supra .
Jones v. Western Preferred Cas. Co. 633 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Griffin v. Manning 633 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Thomas v. Tony's Seafood, Ltd. 633 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
O'QUINN v. Power House Services, Inc. 633 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. 627 So. 2d 1358 La. 1993
Cantrelle v. KIVA CONST. & ENGINEERING 630 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ly v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections 633 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
S & S Cash Register & Computer Co. v. Caldarera 627 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Dabog v. Deris 625 So. 2d 492 La. 1993
(citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., ).
Wainwright v. Leary 623 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Trammel v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. 637 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. 620 So. 2d 811 La. 1993
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Coffin v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. Univ. 620 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 618 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Zion v. Stockfieth 616 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Stobart v. State Through DOTD 617 So. 2d 880 La. 1993
McCullom v. Regional Transit Authority 616 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Coblentz v. North Peters Parking, Inc., (La.App.
Beckham v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court set *764 forth a : (1) the appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and (2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong.
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government 615 So. 2d 289 La. 1993
Laper v. BOARD OF COM'RS, PORT OF NEW ORLEANS 617 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Coblentz v. North Peters Parking, Inc., (La.App.
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Sherman v. K.D. Auger Trucking, Inc. 607 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court described the two part test to be used for appellate review of facts: 1.
Joseph v. Cannon 609 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 606 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Martin v. G & a LTD. 604 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992