Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

McLain v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center 602 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Simeon v. Doe 602 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that under a duty/risk analysis, the following four inquiries must be answered in the affirmative before plaintiff can recover under a negligence theory: 1.
Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, *1042 Inc., 260 La.
Miller v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 601 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Verdun v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Verdun v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Marshall v. a & P Food Co. of Tallulah 587 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Durkee v. City of Shreveport 587 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Housley v. Cerise 579 So. 2d 973 La. 1991
we again described the two-part test to be used for appellate review of fact: 1) the appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and *976 2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is n
Hidding v. Williams 578 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 576 So. 2d 978 La. 1991
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Autin v. Martin 576 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Brantley v. General Motors Corp. 573 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Plaintiff argues that Coco does not apply in this setting
Jaggers v. Free State Tool Corp. 571 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Pastor v. Lafayette Bldg. Ass'n 567 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Housley v. Cerise 568 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: “In a personal injury lawsuit, the test for determining the causal relationship between the accident and subsequent operations is whether the plaintiff proved through medical testimony that it was more probable than not that subsequent operations were caused by trauma
Sprinkle v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 564 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
delineated the standard of review on appeal as follows: “Appellate courts may not disturb the fact findings of the trier of fact in the absence of manifest error.
Bellas v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 564 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
American Motorists Ins. Co. v. American Rent-All, Inc. 566 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
SUCCESSION OF THEROIT v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 560 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
Landry v. Melancon 558 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lawrence v. Dunaway 554 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McElveen v. City of New Orleans 553 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Winstead v. Ed's Live Catfish & Seafood, Inc. 554 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Stephens v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, et al., (La.App.
Cupstid v. Harrison Hardwood Mfg. Co. 552 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
Molbert v. Toepfer 550 So. 2d 183 La. 1989
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Doucet v. B & R Petroleum Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
Harvey v. Ouachita Parish School Bd. 545 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Brightman v. Regional Transit Authority 543 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
The RTA's second assignment of error seeks modification of the Trial Court's equal apportionment of fault, yields no, or at worst, minimal, liability to it because of the "peremptive duty" owed by Morgan as a turning motorist.
Archie v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. 543 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In support of this contention
Creel v. SA Tarver & Son Tractor Co. 537 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Trahan v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 536 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Tippett v. Maryland Casualty Co. 536 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
at pages 1127-1128, the Supreme Court summarized the applicable standard of review: “Appellate courts may not disturb the fact findings of the trier of fact in the absence of manifest error.
Callahan v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 535 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Marcel v. Allstate Ins. Co. 536 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Streeter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 533 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Johnson v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 531 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Seaberry v. Smith 527 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Considering all of the medical testimony and evidence, we find that plaintiff has proved by a preponderance of the evidence the causal connection between his ruptured lumbar disc, and the accident which is the focus of this suit.
Cypress Oilfield Contr. v. McGoldrick Oil 525 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Meshell v. Shamsie 528 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., 260 La.
DeGruy v. Pala, Inc. 525 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Trapani v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 524 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Anderson v. McCarty 519 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
We are not required to simply ratify the trier of fact’s refusal to accept as credible “greatly preponderant objectively-corroborated testimony where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection and where the factual finding itself has been reached by overlooking applicable legal principles.”
Ladner v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark 519 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Istre v. ABC Ins. Co. 517 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987