Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

LAD Services of Louisiana, L.L.C. v. Superior Derrick Services, LLC 167 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Prine v. Coastal Bridge Co. 157 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The factfinder must be “justified in his conclusions.”
Tamayo v. American National General Insurance Co. 150 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Louisiana Board of Ethics v. Ralph Wilson and Hon. Louie Bernard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Louisiana Board of Ethics v. Wilson 161 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lakeview Regional Medical Center v. Washington Parish School Board 152 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Melinda L. Cardenas Owens v. Kevin R. Owens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Evelyn Anderson v. Moreno's Air Conditioning, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The supreme court’s two-part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Anderson v. Moreno's Air Conditioning, Inc. 140 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The supreme court’s two-part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Owens v. Owens 140 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Harbin v. Ward 147 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Roberts v. Rudzis 146 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ly v. State Through Dept, of Public Safety and Corrections, (La.App.
Maddox v. Bailey 146 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Deborah Monk v. United Fire & Casualty Ins. Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Monk v. United Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 139 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Johnson v. Montoya 145 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mazzini v. Strathman 140 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Clement v. Carbon 153 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Gina Alpizar v. Dollar General Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Donald Buxton, Sr. v. State of La., Dept. of Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Alpizar v. Dollar General 134 So. 3d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Buxton v. State ex rel. Dept. of Corrections 135 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Gibson v. Barmore 134 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Hammond v. Rahsaana 135 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Pointe Coupee Parish School Board v. Louisiana School Employee's Retirement System 140 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
LeBlanc v. Appurao 138 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Sylvia Lemoine v. Xavier Desmond Thornton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The supreme court’s two part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Alton Leon Fields, Sr. v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The supreme court’s two-part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Lemoine v. Thornton 161 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The supreme court’s two part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lazara v. Foti, 02-2888, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), ; (1987).
Johnson v. Thomas 137 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 130 So. 3d 922 La. 2013
David Guillot v. Dolgencorp, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Guillot v. Dolgencorp, L.L.C. 127 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Leroy Herron v. Labor Finders-Lfi Fort Pierce, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Arceneaux, 365 So.2d at 1333
Herron v. Labor Finders-LFI Fort Pierce, Inc. 126 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Arceneaux, 365 So.2d at 1333
Gay v. Georgia-Pacific 184 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Arthur L. Gibson, Jr. v. Louisiana Rice Mill, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Valerie Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. 124 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Cockerham v. Cockerham 201 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Quality Paint Hardware & Marine Supply Inc. v. Crescent Coating & Services, Inc. 123 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Arceneaux, 365 So.2d at 1333
James v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 122 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Starkey v. Livingston Parish Council 122 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Powell v. Craft 117 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Marilyn Mosley Haggerty v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
on of the award to the plaintiff and [the award] constitutes an abuse of discretion.” ANALYSIS The law is well established the determination of “[w]hether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Mosley-Haggerty v. Allstate Insurance Co. 115 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
rial court is manifestly erroneous in its calculation of the award to the plaintiff and [the award] constitutes an abuse of discretion.” ANALYSIS The law is well established the determination of “[w]hether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by