Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120.

1208 citing documents.

Lucy R. Romero, Exe of Estate of D. Romero v. Clayton Cola, Sr. and Anna Cola La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
The contours of this test provide “that a reviewing court must do more than simply review the record for some evidence which supports or controverts the trial court’s finding.” Lobell, 15-0247, p. 6, ––– So.3d at –––
Romero v. Cola 193 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
contours of this .test provide “that a reviewing court must do more than simply review the record for some evidence which supports or controverts the trial court’s finding,” Lobell [v. Rosenberg ], 16-0247, p. 6, [186] So.3d [83] at [90 (La.2015) ], ; 1127 (La.1987).
Wilson v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. 192 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
Victoria Dauzat v. Dolgencorp, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Dauzat v. Dolgencorp, LLC 215 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Vanessa Weaver v. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/14/94),] 630 So.2d [733]
Weaver v. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. 186 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Freeman [v. Poulan/Weed Eater], 93-1530 [ (La.1/14/94),] 630 So.2d [733]
In re Interdiction of Benson 216 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hess v. Magnolia Behavioral Healthcare, L.L.C. 189 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Namias v. Sunbelt Innovative Plastics, LLC 190 So. 3d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Lobell v. Rosenberg 184 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The contours of this test provide “that a reviewing court must do more than simply review the record for some evidence which supports or controverts the trial court’s finding.” Lobell , 15-0247, p. 6, — So.3d at —
KM, Inc. v. Weil Cleaners, Inc. 185 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
McMillian v. Anderson, 45,929 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/11), .
Cyril Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hilkirk v. Johnson 183 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Sheila J. Martin v. Carlos Nolen, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Martin v. Nolen 181 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Marcushawn L. Smith v. Ville Platte Housing Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Jeffery Smith v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Herbert Marshall v. Courville Toyota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
James Nicholas Arterburn v. Karen Ann Powers Arterburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Arterburn v. Arterburn 176 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Marshall v. Courvelle Toyota 175 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Freeman v. Washington Parish Fire District 6 181 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Stobart v. State, through Department of Transportation and Development
Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Deklerk v. Deklerk 174 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Fecke v. Board of Supervisors 180 So. 3d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Scott v. City of Shreveport 169 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Lacy Berthiaume v. Keith Gros La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Berthiaume v. Gros 165 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish 171 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
John Ford Dietz v. Anne Bennett Morrison Dietz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Edmond v. Cherokee Insurance Co. 170 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Leslie Ann Schuller v. Robert William Schuller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Moreland v. Gungor 163 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Broussard v. Zurich American Ins.
Masonite Corporation D/B/A Louisiana Millwork v. Service Door & Millwork, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Masonite Corp. v. Service Door & Millwork, LLC 162 So. 3d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Stevenson v. Serth 169 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-1128 (La.1987); Maynor v. Vosburg, 25,922, p. 8 (La.App.
Estates New Orleans v. McCoy 162 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McKamey v. Carona 169 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
D.M.S. v. I.D.S. 225 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales and Use Tax Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales & Use Tax Dept. 157 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jessica Dauzat v. Marcus Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Pollard v. Schiff 161 So. 3d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Brian M. Stelly v. Jeanne B. Stelly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
The supreme court’s two-part test for appellate review of a factual finding requires: “1) The appellate court must find from the record that there is a reasonable factual basis for the finding of the trial court, and 2) The appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Hobgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 156 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Romero-Zambrano v. Bell 165 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a two-part test for the reversal of factual findings: first, the appellate court must find from the record that a | ^reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding of the trial court; and, second, the appellate court must further determine that the recor
White v. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014