Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brooks, 505 So. 2d 714.

325 citing documents.

State v. Batchelor 823 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Logan 822 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Porche 819 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. George 829 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); cert.
State v. Celestine 811 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Francis 809 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/27/01) , , cert.
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
2052 ; (an attorney's competence is not judged by the success of a particular strategy hence "no-question defense" was not a deviation below professional norms but a deliberate tactical choice designed to rob the state of the force of its evidence; hindsight is not the test of Sixth Amendment ineffectiveness cl
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
rev'd, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), .
State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Broyard 802 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lewis 800 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Vigne 798 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-23 (La.1987); State v. Jones, 97-2217 (La.App.
State v. Mathews 809 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Homes 799 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.”
State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Oliver 786 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Dyer 794 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Collins 787 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Jason 787 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Rodriguez 786 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 782 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lacy 782 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” cert.
State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” Id., ( cert.
State v. Davis 781 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Laneheart 778 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Leban 777 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” cert.
State v. Jason 779 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Myers 773 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is |10successful.” cert.
State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Toney 796 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Wilson 773 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
State v. Weaver 770 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. James 788 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 766 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 764 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Russell 764 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000