Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brooks, 505 So. 2d 714.

325 citing documents.

State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
-718 (La.1987); -726 (La.1980); La.Rev.Stat.
State v. Griffin 756 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. McGee 757 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Biagas 754 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Davis 751 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Jenkins 750 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Green 750 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hall 750 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Thomas 750 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” cert.
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
State v. Gilliam 748 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); cert.
State v. Brooks 765 So. 2d 993 La. 1999
(emphasis added), that “in this case, there may well have been insufficient proof that Brooks had the intent to condition [the victim’s] release on anyone’s giving up of anything of value” was not necessary to the ultimate disposition of the case and was therefore non binding dicta.
State v. Meyers 748 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Talley 748 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” cert.
State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Valrie 749 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
App. 3 Cir. 5/4/94); ; cert.
State v. Edwards 746 So. 2d 1267 La. 1999
14:24 (all persons “concerned” in the commission of a crime are principals); State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (“Acting in concert, each [perpetrator] [becomes] responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other.”); -18 (La.1987) (“Even if, as claimed, defendant did not personally pull the ^trigger, his presence and assistance up to this point provided a basis from which jurors could have concluded that he actively acquiesced in th[e] use of deadly force.”).
State v. Pratt 748 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Perez 744 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Bryant 744 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Bordes 738 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Raby 738 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Koon 730 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
15:451; certiorari denied, 484 U.S. 947 , 108 S.Ct.
State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. DeSilva 726 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Burns 723 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Shelvin 720 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
14:24 ("[a]ll persons concerned in the commission of a crime whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.") cert.
State v. Green 731 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson 718 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Neither may an attorney’s level of representation be determined by whether a particular strategy is successful.” cert.
State v. Tolbert 716 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. *955 Brooks, cert.
State v. McDonald 718 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Smith 717 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Perkins 716 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); cert.
State v. Johnson 716 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Atkins 713 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Chess 713 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Richardson 703 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Labostrie 702 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Cole 702 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Corley 703 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); cert.