DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Holiday v. Borden Chemical, 508 So. 2d 1381.

119 citing documents.

  • Dessie Falcon Bella v. Mary Knieper and Henry Knieper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • Mona Leblanc v. Walmart Distribution Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • Michael Boudreaux v. Take 5, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    (quoting West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., ).
  • Patricia Matthews v. Big Easy Janitorial, L.L.C., and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurers Fund La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • Leroy Johnson v. Lofton Staffing Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • David Pizzati v. Ds Services of America, Inc. and Safety National Casualty Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    rden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
  • Toni Marie Jones v. Progressive Baptist Church of Louisiana and Church Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • Chad Yokum v. Westport Linen Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • Alicia Alvis v. Peninsula Gaming Partners, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • Rachel Phillips v. Kirkland's Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • Guy v. Kelps & Will Prop Shop 272 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1979) ; citing Holiday v. Borden Chemical , , 1383 (La.
  • Debra S. Lenox v. Central Louisiana Spokes, LLC D/B/A Renegade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Lenox v. Cent. La. Spokes, LLC 265 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Welborn v. Thompson Construction 191 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Herbert Marshall v. Courville Toyota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Marshall v. Courvelle Toyota 175 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Prine v. Coastal Bridge Co. 157 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Jackson v. Stanley 147 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Galloway Jefcoat, LLP v. D. Patrick (Rick") Keating " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    ct-finder “should accept as true a witness‟s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent „circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.‟” [Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., ] at 361 [(La.1992)] (quoting [West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., ], ).
  • Galloway Jefcoat, LLP v. Keating 138 So. 3d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    supreme court stated: [T]he fact-finder “should accept as true a witness’s uneontradieted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ‘circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.’ ” [Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., ] at 361 [ (La.1992) ] (quoting [West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., ], (La.
  • Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. James Constance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. Constance 137 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Cleo Alexander v. Peerless Cleaners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness‘s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ―circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.‖ West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Alexander v. Peerless Cleaners 134 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    unciated the trial court’s function and the appellate court’s standard of review: In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Leroy Herron v. Labor Finders-Lfi Fort Pierce, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    at, in deciding whether the plaintiff- worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the fact-finder “should accept as true a witness‟s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent „circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.‟ ” 593 So.2d at 361 (quoting West, 371 So.2d at 1147, ).
  • Herron v. Labor Finders-LFI Fort Pierce, Inc. 126 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In Bruno, we cautioned that, in deciding whether the plaintiff-worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the fact-finder “should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ‘circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.’ ” 593 So.2d at 361 (quoting West, 371 So.2d at 1147 , ).
  • Barbara Brown v. Lafayette Association of Retarded Citizens, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    hat, in deciding whether the plaintiff- worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the fact-finder ―should accept as true a witness‘s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ‗circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.‘‖ 593 So.2d at 361 (quoting West, 371 So.2d at 1147, ).
  • Brown v. Lafayette Ass'n of Retarded Citizens 94 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    *955 In Bruno, we cautioned that, in deciding whether the plaintiff-worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the fact-finder “should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ‘circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.’ ” 593 So.2d at 361 (quoting West, 371 So.2d at 1147 , ).
  • Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 94 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    .2d 325 , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: [[Image here]] In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Dana Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. 95 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    a. In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Terry Rideaux v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West [v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.], 371 So.2d [1146, 1147 (La.1979);]
  • Rideaux v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. 80 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West [v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.], 371 So.2d [1146, 1147 (La.1979);]
  • Duran v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 70 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno, 593 So.2d at 361 (citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., 371 So.2d at 1147 ; ).
  • Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. 56 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
    In Bruno , we cautioned that, in deciding whether the plaintiff-worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the fact-finder “should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent ‘circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.’ ” 593 So.2d at 361 (quoting West, 371 So.2d at 1147 , ).
  • Robert Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” 3 West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Minor v. J & J CARPET, INC. 40 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” 14 West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Dragon Express v. Chesser 40 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Ragle Celestine v. Firestone Polymers, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Celestine v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. 38 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147 ; (La.
  • Keith Smith v. Boise Cascade, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Smith v. BOISE CASCADE, LLC 34 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Billy Ray Woodard v. Town of Colfax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Woodard v. TOWN OF COLFAX 29 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Riker v. POPEYE'S FRIED CHICKEN 29 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Gregory Scott v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” 4 West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • Scott v. City of Pineville 8 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147
  • David Bailey v. Aecom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d at 1147