Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue, 523 So. 2d 201.

33 citing documents.

Thomas D'Aquin v. the Housing Authority of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has repeatedly stated, “[i]t is well settled than an individual’s right of judicial review of administrative proceedings is presumed to exist.” Loop, (La.
Johnette Martin v. Board of Adjustment, through It's Chairman, The City/Parish of East Baton Rouge, and Richelle Decuir … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
However, it was subsequently recognized in Loop, n. l ( La.
Westlawn Cemeteries, L.L.C. Versus The Louisiana Cemetery Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
at 371 (citing Loop, (La.
TDX Associates, LP v. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Paul Hellmers v. Department of Fire La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Unlike a NOFD employee’s guaranteed right to appeal a director’s’ decision to the Commission, NOFD, as a governmental agency, does not have a constitutionally guaranteed right of judicial review and “necessarily must rely upon and comply with statutory provisions for such review.” Loop, Inc, v. Collector of Revenue, (La.
Paulette Cooper Versus City of Kenner La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
(Citations omitted) Loop, –03 (La.
Joseph v. Secretary, Louisiana Department Of Natural Resources 265 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
(citing Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue , , 203 (La.
Quatrevingt v. State 242 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Id ., citing Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue , , 203 (La.
Harvey v. State 183 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Finally, in making the quoted statement, the Metro Riverboat Court specifically rested upon its prior decision in Loop, which held that "[w]hen the statute upon which [a litigant] relies establishes a specific procedure for judicial review of an agency’s action, a litigant may invoke the reviewing court’s jurisdiction only by following the statutorily prescribed procedure, unless there can be found within the act a genu
Bridges v. Bullock 124 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
The court further noted that “the existence of a specific statutory procedure generally implies a legislative intent that the special statutory procedure be the exclusive means of obtaining judicial review in the situations to which it applies.” Id., citing Loop
Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 50 So. 3d 823 La. 2010
Gaming Control Bd., 01-0185 (La.10/6/01), ; Loop
Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 50 So. 3d 823 La. 2010
City of Baton Rouge v. Bethley 68 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Johnson v. ZACHARY MUNICIPAL FIRE & POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const, art. V, § 16; Loop, (La.
Meiners v. St. Tammany Fire Protection District 4 Board of Commissioners 31 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const. art. V, § 16(B); Loop
Miazza v. City of Mandeville, Department of Police 31 So. 3d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. V, § 16(B); Loop, Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd., 01-0185 (La.10/16/01), .
St. Martin v. State 25 So. 3d 736 La. 2009
Willows v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals 15 So. 3d 56 La. 2009
Further, “for the purpose of judicial review of administrative action, district courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and only have appellate jurisdiction to review administrative decisions as provided by the legislature or constitution.” Metro Riverboat, supra (citing Loop, ).
City of Baton Rouge v. Bernard 840 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Peterson v. Austin 836 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Peterson v. Toffton 828 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Madison v. Ward 825 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In Loop, -203 (La.1987), the court observed that "[b]y definition, appellate jurisdiction is the power to review the judgment of another tribunal.
Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 797 So. 2d 656 La. 2001
Lightfoot v. Stalder 808 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Why the Touchette court did not apply and interpret the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, that allows the lower court to act as an appellate court, is unknown; however, it was not clearly explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court until 1987 in Loop, wherein that court made it clear that "Generally, a court's review of an administrative tribunal's action is considered functionally to be an exercise of its appellate review jurisdiction."
Blair v. Stalder 798 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Why the Touchette court did not apply and interpret the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, which allows the lower court to act as an appellate court, is unknown; however, it was not clearly explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court until 1987 in Loop, (La.
Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Re Shintech 734 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In Loop, (On Rehearing), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that for the purpose of judicial review of an administrative action, district courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having only such appellate jurisdiction as is constitutionally required or as is provided by law.
Boeing Co. v. Louisiana Dept. of Economic Development 657 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
[6] Bowen, 253 So.2d at 205 ; Delta Bank & Trust Co., 383 So.2d at 335 ; Loop, (La.App.
Kelty v. Brumfield 633 So. 2d 1210 La. 1994
(on original hearing); Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. Lassiter, Comm'r of Financial Institutions, (Commissioner of Financial Institutions held to be a state agency whose non-adjudicative action in approving a bank charter was subject to administrative judicial review).
Matter of American Waste & Poll. Control 588 So. 2d 367 La. 1991
We have previously discussed this question of judicial review of administrative agency determinations in Loop
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. State, Department of Environmental Quality 588 So. 2d 367 La. 1991
We have previously discussed this question of judicial review of administrative agency determinations in Loop
In the Matter of American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 580 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Moore v. Roemer 560 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
839 , (1971); Loop, (La.App.