DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Guezuraga, 512 So. 2d 366.

40 citing documents.

  • Succession of Jo Beth Rettig Baggett La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • Succession of Stephen J. Dibeneditto La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • Succession of Eldrick Ray Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Succession of Elmer Eugene Faulk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Succession of Clarence Spain . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    “In accordance with legislative intent, courts liberally construe and apply the statute, maintaining the validity of the will if at all possible, as long as it is in substantial compliance with the statute.” Liner, 19-02011, p. 4, 320 So.3d at 1137 9 ( (La.
  • Succession of Anita Wimmer McKlinski . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    “In accordance with legislative intent, courts liberally construe and apply the statute, maintaining the validity of the will if at all possible, as long as it is in substantial compliance with the statute.” Liner, 2019-02011, p. 4, 320 So.3d at 1137 ( (La.
  • Succession Of James Conway Liner, III (Parish of Ouachita) Original D Ecree Vac Ated; C Ourt Of Ap … La. 2021
  • Succession of Linda F. Enos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 The supreme court, in (citation omitted), addressed the appropriateness of these principles of liberality: [W]e are not required to give the statutory will a strict interpretation.
  • Succession of John L. Carter, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
    Holbrook, 144 So.3d at 851, (La.
  • Succession of James Conway Liner, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    In re Succession of Holbrook, supra; (La.
  • In re Harlan 250 So. 3d 220 La. 2018
    1/28/14), , 851 ; Succession of Guezuraga , , 368 (La.
  • In re Rogers 243 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    1/28/14), ; Succession of Guezuraga , (La.
  • Successions of Toney 226 So. 3d 397 La. 2017
    The applicant rightly notes that this court in Holbrook relied heavily on our previous decision in (La.
  • In the Matter of the Succession of John Robert Biscamp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    In accord therewith, our courts have strived to maintain a testament’s validity “as long as it is in substantial compliance with the statute.”
  • In re the Succession of Biscamp 211 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    In accord therewith, our courts have strived to maintain a testament’s validity “as long as it is in substantial compliance with the statute.”
  • Explained Succession of Holbrook 144 So. 3d 845 La. 2014
    As we explained in : But we are not required to give the statutory will a strict interpretation.
  • Succession of Gladys Knott Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    We discussed 8 wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: But we are not required to give the statutory will a strict interpretation.
  • Succession of Hebert 101 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    We discussed wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: But we are not required to give the statutory will a strict interpretation.
  • Jodi Sylvester v. Jonell Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    In re Succession of Simonson, 07-742 (La.App.
  • Sylvester v. Fontenot 58 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In re Succession of Simonson, 07-742 (La.App.
  • In Re Succession of Carlton 34 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Finally, the Aunts’ reliance on is misplaced and we have addressed this same argument before in Succession of Slay, 99-1753 (La.App.
  • Succession of Donnie Dewayne Carlton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Finally, the Aunts’ reliance on is misplaced and we have addressed this same argument before in Succession of Slay, 99-1753 (La.App.
  • Distinguished In Re the Succession of Hendricks 28 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    10 |7The fact that the testator in this case failed to sign a page of the testament containing dispositive provisions makes this case distinguishable from (La.
  • In Re Succession of Simonson 982 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Succession of Cyril Hinds La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The supreme court, in (citation omitted), addressed the appropriateness of these principles of liberality: [W]e are not required to give the statutory3 will a strict interpretation.
  • Succession of Hinds 952 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The supreme court, in (citation omitted), addressed the appropriateness of these principles of liberality: [W]e are not required to give the statutory [3] will a strict interpretation.
  • Succession of Sampognaro 865 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that in accordance with the legislative intent, courts liberally construed and applied the statutory will statute, maintaining the validity of a will if at all possible, as long as the will was in substantial compliance with the statute.
  • Succession of Maquar 849 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The appellee cites in support of her argument that will formalities are not sacrosanct and that adherence to will formalities should be liberally construed.
  • Succession of Aycock 809 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • In Re Succession of Slay 764 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    9:2442 because there was an absence of any showing of fraud
  • Jameson v. Nugent 764 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    9:2442 because there was an absence of any showing of fraud
  • Succession of Bilyeu 681 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Succession of Hogan 666 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    The history of statutory wills was discussed in relative to a will in which a testatrix failed to sign her name on the last page, which contained only the last part of the attestation clause.
  • Successions of Eddy 664 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Succession of Songne 664 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Succession of Squires 640 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    In the testatrix failed to sign her name on the last page, which contained only the last part of the attestation clause.
  • Succession of Edwards 619 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Succession of King 595 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    However, they contend that the Louisiana Supreme Court has implicitly overruled these cases in and (La.
  • Succession of Marcello 532 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    In the Supreme Court quoted the following from an article appearing at 25 Loy.L.Rev.
  • Newsom v. Boothe 524 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988