Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp., 530 So. 2d 1151.

125 citing documents.

Inka's S'Coolwear, Inc. v. School Time, LLC 725 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hardy v. Bowie 719 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Caldwell v. LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLL FEST. 717 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Crockett v. Cardona 713 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Galligan, A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.
Byers v. Edmondson 712 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Sanderson 715 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Davis v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 709 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hosp., Barre v. Nadell, 94-1883 (La.App.
Descant v. ADM'RS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Hosp., Barre v. Nadell, 94-1883 (La.App.
Bethea v. Modern Biomedical Services, Inc. 704 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Barrino v. E. BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. 697 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer 698 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Cowen v. Steiner 689 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
2 M. Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law, Part 1, Sections 863-865 (1959)"
Lambert v. Word of Faith Ministries 673 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the Court stated: The duty risk approach is most helpful ...
Daly v. Reed 669 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Mayo v. Audubon Indem. Ins. Co. 666 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Latullas v. State 658 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
a malpractice case involving the subsequent birth of a child following a tubal litigation procedure, the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of an unplanned and unwanted birth of a child.
In Re Medical Review Panel 657 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The trial court improperly allowed the jury to consider "loss of enjoyment of life" and "emotional and mental distress *718 since recovery from delivery and in the future" as separate elements of damages when the Louisiana Supreme Court in [ Pitre v. Opelousas General Hospital, ] did not allow those categories as separate elements of damages.
Beis v. Bowers 649 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
White v. White 641 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2 M. Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law, Part 1, Sections 863-865 (1959)"
Cheatham v. Cox 642 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Meany v. Meany 639 So. 2d 229 La. 1994
William E. Crow, The Anatomy of a Tort, 22 Loy.L.Rev.
Lopinto v. Tessier 637 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Reis v. Fenasci & Smith 635 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Gulf South Business Systems & Consultants, Inc. v. State ex rel. Department of Environmental Quality 625 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Goza v. Cornwell 622 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
Charia v. Hulse 619 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Henry v. TACO-TIO, Inc. 614 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Plaintiff asserts that Louisiana does recognize a
Carter v. Smith 607 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Jarreau v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 600 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
Uhrbach v. Lin 601 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Pines v. Dr. Carlos D. Moreno, Inc., (La.App.
Gugliuzza v. KCMC, INC. 593 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Smith v. American Indem. Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent. 598 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Barbella v. Touro Infirmary 596 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Richard v. Borden, Inc. 597 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-56 (La.1988) (for duty-risk analysis).
Nehrenz v. Dunn 593 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Massey v. G.B. Cooley Hospital for Retarded Citizens 593 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Rodriguez v. American Bankers Ins.
Suhr v. Felter 589 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In a recent opinion, the Supreme Court, in an excellent opinion by Justice Dennis, had occasion to give a thorough discussion of the entire issue of cause in fact and legal cause.
Philippe v. Lloyd's Aero Boliviano 589 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Community Coffee Company, Inc. v. Tri-Parish Construction & Materials Inc., (La.App.
Persilver v. Louisiana Department of Transportation 592 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Pines v. Dr. Carlos D. Moreno, Inc., (La.App.
Moore v. Healthcare Elmwood, Inc. 582 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Gary on Behalf of Gary v. Meche 577 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Roberts v. Benoit 574 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Miller v. Everett 576 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
* * * * * * Pitre [v. Opelousas General Hosp., ] characterizes the inquiry as, "`whether defendant owed a duty of reasonable care to the plaintiffs and whether his negligence was a legal cause of the damage done....'" Id.
Keith v. Comco Insurance Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Keith v. Comco Ins. Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991