Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp., 530 So. 2d 1151.

125 citing documents.

Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
Hosp., (La 1988) as presaging the overruling of Black v. Carrollton R.R.
Pines v. Dr. Carlos D. Moreno, Inc. 569 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The court gave the following pertinent reasons for its decision: A. The petition does not state a cause of action, under the Pitre decision, [ ] on behalf of Lisa Pines, for the loss of society and companionship with her daughter; B. The petition under Pitre , does not state a cause of action on behalf of Lisa Pines for any general medical expenses, or any general claims for mental anguish, based on the birth of a child with a *206 deformity, unless
Smith v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 571 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Chance v. STATE, DOTD 567 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Brown v. Tesack 566 So. 2d 955 La. 1990
Lloyd v. Howard 566 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3d Cir.1987), aff'd rev'd on other grounds.
Morrow v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 562 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Maxwell v. Soileau 561 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 558 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Devereux v. Allstate Ins. Co. 557 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Zeagler v. Town of Jena 556 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Zeagler v. Town of Jena, supra .
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
Shroyer v. Grush 555 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Boyer v. Seal 553 So. 2d 827 La. 1989
Stewart v. Dixilyn-Field Drilling 552 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the duty/risk analysis at page 1155: "Under one analytical approach, in order for a defendant to be held liable for damages caused another by his negligence, affirmative answers must be given to these questions: (1) given the relationship and circumstances of the parti
Bourgeois v. Ochsner Foundation Hospital & Clinic 550 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See also the Supreme Court’s extensive consideration of the physician’s
Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 547 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Bellah v. STATE FARM FIR & CAS. INS. CO. 546 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Art. 964; Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp., Inc., (La.App.
LP v. Oubre 547 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
with Hill v. Lundin, 260 La.
King v. Louviere 543 So. 2d 1327 La. 1989
LeJeune v. Rayne Branch Hospital 539 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 538 So. 2d 228 La. 1989
2 M. Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law, Part 1, §§ 863-865 (1959)
Smith v. Gottsegen 535 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Harmon v. Levenson 534 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
At oral argument of this matter plaintiffs' counsel referred us to a recent medical malpractice decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court