Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

State v. Mitchell 815 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
He contends that, because there was no "uncontradicted and/or unimpeached testimony" to support the convictions
State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Denham 804 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Moses 806 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Payne 806 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Landry 804 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Richthofen 803 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Spencer 802 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Brealy 800 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Monds, supra, p. 4 , 631 So.2d at 539 .
State v. Singleton 801 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Craft 796 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.'" State v. Juluke, 98-341, p. 4 (La.1/8/99); ( (alteration in original)).
State v. Meredith 796 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
(generally, one witness's positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.
State v. Dunbar 798 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Coleman 792 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
(citing Jackson, supra at 319 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Price 792 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Bloodworth 790 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Charles 790 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Edwards 790 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Jordan, 98-823 (La.
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Elliot 809 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Randolph 788 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Knight 794 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Toups 792 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Walker 789 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Brown 808 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art. 821(B); -1309 (La.1988).
State v. Charles 787 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Collins 787 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State ex rel. T.E. 787 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Points 787 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
State v. Cojoe 785 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001