Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.
-
State v. Marston
780 So. 2d 1058
La. 2001
While the Jackson standard of review does not permit an appellate court to substitute its own opinion for that of the trier of fact as to what has or has not been proved by the state's evidence, "`the jury cannot be permitted to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.'" (quoting 2 Charles Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal 2d, § 467 (2d ed.1982)).
- State v. King 782 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
State v. Ellwood
783 So. 2d 423
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the reviewing court must ask whether a hypothetical rational trier of fact, interpreting al of the evidence in favor of the prosecution, could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
- State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Davis 781 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Chairs 780 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Crockharn 780 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Laneheart 778 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
State v. Upchurch
783 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 821(B); -1309 (La.1988).
- State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
-
State v. Hampton
782 So. 2d 1045
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 821(B); 1309 (La.1988).
- State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Durant 776 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
State v. Peters
774 So. 2d 1270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
P. art. 821(B); -09 (La.1988).
- State v. Moore 777 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Boudreaux 777 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
State v. Leger
775 So. 2d 1169
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
However, "Due Process requires the reviewing court to determine `whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'" -09 (La.1988) (quoting Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319 , 99 S.Ct.
-
State v. Johnson
800 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) ().
-
State v. Dennis
777 So. 2d 569
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State v. Payne
777 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
art. 821(B); 1309 (La.1988).
- State v. Jackson 778 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Guss
775 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Myers, 584 So.2d at 249 .
- State v. Osborne 775 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Pleasant 772 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Handy 772 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Carpenter 772 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- State v. Jones 772 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
- State v. Chisolm 771 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Everett 770 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. McGrew
769 So. 2d 782
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
art. 821(B); 1309 (La.1988).
- State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Ballansaw 769 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Dillion 770 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Derouselle 769 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Palermo
765 So. 2d 1155
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
art. 821(B); 1309 (La.1988).
-
State v. Roussel
767 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
art. 821(B); 1309 (La.1988).