Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coleman v. Coleman, 541 So. 2d 1003.
- Tyfanny Vermaelen v. Harry Vermaelen, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
-
Vermaelen v. Vermaelen
240 So. 3d 1004
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
at 793 (citing Coleman v. Coleman , (La.App.
-
Jarvis Harmon, Sr. v. Victoria Williams Harmon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
If the trial court‘s findings are reasonable, i.e. not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, then they will not be disturbed.‖ [Terry, 954 So.2d] at 793 ( (La.App.
-
Harmon v. Harmon
101 So. 3d 1122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
If the trial court’s findings are reasonable, i.e. not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, then they will not be disturbed.” [Terry, 954 So.2d] at 793 ( (La.App.
-
Laney Ray Barlow, Jr. v. Sandra Guillot Barlow
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
If the trial court‘s findings are reasonable, i.e. not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, then they will not be disturbed.‖ [Terry, 954 So.2d] at 793 ( (La.App.
-
Barlow v. Barlow
87 So. 3d 386
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
If the trial court’s findings are reasonable, i.e. not manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, then they will not be disturbed.” [Terry, 954 So.2d] at 793 ( (La.App.
-
Sharon Whiddon Schulze v. Kevin Lane Schulze
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/28/07), ( (La.App.
-
Seth Scarborough v. Dora Maria Ybanez
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/28/07), ( (La.App.
-
Scarborough v. YBANEZ
30 So. 3d 1187
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/28/07), , 793 ( (La.App.
- Cormier v. Cormier 3 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Rhonda Henry v. Don E. Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Henry v. Henry 999 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Wolff v. Wolff 966 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Christopher K. Wolff v. Elizabeth B. Wolff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Terry v. Terry 954 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Eugene John Terry v. Wilma Jane Terry, Born Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Lyons v. Lyons 768 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Minella v. Minella 713 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- Simon v. Simon 696 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
Roussel v. Roussel
688 So. 2d 160
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
* * * The testimony of both parties indicated a fractured relationship characterized by a pattern of 14mutual harassment and nagging.” (La.App.
- Muscarello v. Ayo 644 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Brewhouse, Ltd. v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 614 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Herrell v. Herrell 594 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992