Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op., 542 So. 2d 1081.

45 citing documents.

Flowers v. Entergy Corporation 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), -1086 (La.
Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), -1086 (La.1989); Pillow v. Entergy Corporation, 36,384, p. 5 (LaApp.
Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 2 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), -1086 (La.1989); Pillow v. Entergy *1257 Corporation, 36,384, p. 5 (La.App.
Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
See Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), -1086 (La.1989); Pillow v. Entergy Corporation, 36,384, p. 5 (LaApp.
Hayes v. Entergy Corp. 850 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Pillow v. Entergy Corp. 828 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Membership Cooperative, Simon v. Southwest Louisiana Elec.
In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 795 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Myers v. Dronet 801 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The duty recited in Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), [33] , to exercise utmost care to reduce hazards to life as far as practicable, was not the appropriate duty to impose in this case.
Robertson v. State 747 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Membership Co-op., the supreme court wrote: ...
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.App.
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Membership Cooperative, *957
Clark v. JESUIT HIGH SCH. OF NEW ORLEANS 686 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Thereafter, the supreme court again contemplated the numerous considerations to be reviewed as follows: The legal duty under one approach [duty/risk] and the standard of conduct under the other [negligence] impose the same obligation, ...
Green v. Claiborne Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 677 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Appellant relies primarily on the supreme court case of Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO), (La.
Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Nigreville v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Membership Co-op., Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Company, (La.
Broomfield v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 623 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Blue v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 619 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Laper v. BOARD OF COM'RS, PORT OF NEW ORLEANS 617 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 612 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO)
Astredo v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 612 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Membership Coop., the Court held that a company that employs and maintains high power lines is required to exercise utmost care to reduce hazards as far as practicable.
Graves v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc. 604 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Membership Co-Op., the court stated, "...
Smith v. American Indem. Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
dealing with negligence of an electric company.
Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Membership Co-Op., and Green v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., as follows: Since there are occasions when high voltage electricity will escape from an uninsulated transmission line, and since, if it does, it becomes a menace to those about the point of its escape, the power company's duty, as in
Radcliffe v. Haun 593 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative (SLEMCO)
Bourgeois v. Puerto Rican Marine Management, Inc. 589 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
which allegedly established a heightened duty of care owed by utility companies.
Williams v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 590 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
1990), as follows: Since there are occasions when high voltage electricity will escape from an uninsulated transmission line, and since, if it does, it becomes a menace to those about the point of its escape, the power company's duty, as in other similar situations, to provide against resulting injuries is a funct
Putman v. Gulf States Utilities 588 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-1085, 1088 (La.1989) as follows: A power company is required to recognize that its conduct involves a risk of causing harm to another if a reasonable person would do so while exercising such attention, perception of the circumstances, memory, knowledge of other pertinent matters, intelligence and judgment as a r
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Valiant Ins. Co. v. City of Lafayette 574 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
Malone, Cause In Fact, 9 Stanford L.Rev.
Sipco v. Concordia Electric Co-operative, Inc. 571 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Membership Co-op., , at page 1084 (La.1989).
Calhoun v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. 571 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State Farm Fire & (La.App.
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 567 So. 2d 569 La. 1990
See also Harper James & Gray, The Law of Torts § 16.5 (1986); Prosser & Keeton on Torts § 32 (5th ed. 1984)
Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co. 563 So. 2d 850 La. 1990
Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 561 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-1084 (La.1989) appears the following: The crucial questions are (a) whether the power company was required to recognize that its conduct involved a risk of causing physical injury or loss to another in the manner of that sustained by the plaintiff, and, if so (b) whether the possibility of such injury or loss co
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 558 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. 555 So. 2d 1350 La. 1990
Boyer v. Seal 553 So. 2d 827 La. 1989
E.g., Entrevia, supra; Matthews, supra; (La.
Lajaunie v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co. 552 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Member Cooperative, (SLEMCO)
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 550 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Member Cooperative (SLEMCO)