Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bussie v. Lowenthal, 535 So. 2d 378.

33 citing documents.

Patrick M. Wartelle v. Ellen Mintz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
the supreme court held that “a statement of opinion” does not “give rise to a defamatory factual inference[]” and, thus, “the statement is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.” A pure statement of opinion, which is based totally on the speaker’s subjective view and whic
Jacob Johnson v. Daryl Purpera, Individually And In His Official Capacity As Louisiana Legislative Auditor, State Of Louisiana, … La. 2021
Romero, 94-1105 at 8, 648 So.2d at 870; (La.
Muller v. Fort Pike Volunteer Fire Dep't 275 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See Bussie v. Lowenthal , , 381 (La.
Wainwright v. Tyler 253 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
See also Bussie v. Lowenthal , (La.
Breen v. Holmes 236 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Bussie v. Lowenthal , , 381 (La.
Brunner v. Holloway 235 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Wilbert J. Saucier, Jr. v. Robert E. Washington, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Saucier v. Washington 229 So. 3d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Quinlan v. Sugar-Gold 219 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Russell Meissner v. Millard Bradford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Meissner v. Bradford 156 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Morris J. Baudoin v. Bravo Drilling, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Greene v. State, Ex Rel. Department of Corrections 21 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Assoc. Pro. Educators v. Feder. of Teachers 981 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Tatum v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 982 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Wood v. Del Giorno 974 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Cooksey v. Stewart 938 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Thompson, supra ; Ray, supra .
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc. 929 So. 2d 1211 La. 2006
See Trentecosta v. Beck, 96-2388, pp. 11-12 (La.10/21/97)
Thompson v. Lee 888 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Ray v. City of Bossier City 859 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Brown v. Connor 860 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Baxter v. Scott 847 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
1975 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1967); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra ; (La.
Singleton v. St. Charles Parish 833 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Fitzgerald v. Tucker 737 So. 2d 706 La. 1999
Trentecosta, 703 So.2d at 559
Trentecosta v. Beck 703 So. 2d 552 La. 1997
Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 693 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Christian v. Fontenot 672 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Sassone v. Elder, supra .
Hebert v. Louisiana Ass'n of Rehabilitation Professionals, Inc. 653 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Roy v. Coco 649 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
which held a statement of pure opinion, based totally on the speaker’s subjective view which does not state or imply the existence of underlying facts, is afforded complete protection under the first amendment.
Henderson v. Richardson 649 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
citing New York Times v. Sullivan, supra.
Romero v. Thomson Newspapers 648 So. 2d 866 La. 1995
Sassone v. Elder 626 So. 2d 345 La. 1993
Broussard v. Kaplan 604 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Later, the Court clarified this by stating that a statement of pure opinion, based totally on the speaker’s subjective view which does not state or imply the existence of underlying facts, is afforded complete protection under the First Amendment.